J. Mark Fly

568 total citations
26 papers, 425 citations indexed

About

J. Mark Fly is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Mark Fly has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 425 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 8 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 6 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in J. Mark Fly's work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (9 papers), Forest Management and Policy (7 papers) and Transportation Planning and Optimization (3 papers). J. Mark Fly is often cited by papers focused on Economic and Environmental Valuation (9 papers), Forest Management and Policy (7 papers) and Transportation Planning and Optimization (3 papers). J. Mark Fly collaborates with scholars based in United States, Malawi and Norway. J. Mark Fly's co-authors include H. Ken Cordell, Robert E. Jones, Robert E. Jones, Paul M. Jakus, Patrick C. West, Dale J. Blahna, Donald G. Hodges, Mark Downing, Mark S. Bevelhimer and Charles Sims and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Agricultural Economics and Forest Science.

In The Last Decade

J. Mark Fly

23 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. Mark Fly United States	10	151	136	128	94	66	26	425
George N. Wallace United States	10	168 1.1×	112 0.8×	232 1.8×	77 0.8×	18 0.3×	21	478
Evan E. Hjerpe United States	11	242 1.6×	114 0.8×	83 0.6×	51 0.5×	16 0.2×	19	396
Emilie Beauchamp United Kingdom	9	245 1.6×	86 0.6×	116 0.9×	72 0.8×	42 0.6×	20	410
Erin Betley United States	5	187 1.2×	54 0.4×	59 0.5×	101 1.1×	47 0.7×	13	414
Cathal O. Donoghue Ireland	8	182 1.2×	122 0.9×	51 0.4×	58 0.6×	147 2.2×	11	468
Daniel R. Williams United States	11	423 2.8×	65 0.5×	376 2.9×	68 0.7×	29 0.4×	12	747
Søren Præstholm Denmark	15	278 1.8×	38 0.3×	103 0.8×	57 0.6×	135 2.0×	21	530
Francisco J. Rosado-May United States	6	170 1.1×	41 0.3×	56 0.4×	71 0.8×	53 0.8×	15	440
Andrea Rawluk Australia	14	179 1.2×	34 0.3×	103 0.8×	61 0.6×	31 0.5×	40	417
Rob McMorran United Kingdom	12	229 1.5×	43 0.3×	79 0.6×	61 0.6×	97 1.5×	30	522

Countries citing papers authored by J. Mark Fly

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Mark Fly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Mark Fly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Mark Fly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Mark Fly

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Mark Fly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Mark Fly. The network helps show where J. Mark Fly may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Mark Fly

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Mark Fly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Mark Fly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Mark Fly. J. Mark Fly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Fly, J. Mark, et al.. (2021). Current State of the Horticultural Therapy Profession in the United States. HortTechnology. 31(4). 330–338. 3 indexed citations

Asah, Stanley T., et al.. (2014). Family Forest Owners' Forest Management Understandings: Identifying Opportunities and Audiences for Effective Outreach and Education. Forest Science. 61(1). 105–113. 3 indexed citations

Harper, Craig A., et al.. (2012). Attitudes and motivations of Tennessee deer hunters toward quality deer management. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 36(2). 277–285. 18 indexed citations

Hodges, Donald G., et al.. (2011). Landowner Motivations for Owning Woodland on the Tennessee Northern Cumberland Plateau. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 35(1). 39–43. 4 indexed citations

Fly, J. Mark, et al.. (2010). Do You Hear What I Hear: Better Understanding How Forest Management Is Conceptualized and Practiced by Private Forest Landowners. Journal of Forestry. 108(7). 321–328. 28 indexed citations

Hodges, Donald G., et al.. (2009). Predicting the Probability of Landowner Participation in Conservation Assistance Programs: A Case Study of the Northern Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 33(1). 5–8. 16 indexed citations

Kurtz, William Β., et al.. (2006). Impacts of landscape fragmentation in the Central Hardwood Region of the United States.. 212–225. 1 indexed citations

Sims, Charles, et al.. (2005). Modeling Visitor Acceptance of a Shuttle System in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 23(3). 11 indexed citations

Sims, Charles, et al.. (2004). Modeling the Demand For and Value of OHV Recreation in Tennessee. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 221–230.

10.

Jones, Robert E., et al.. (2003). Green Migration into Rural America: The New Frontier of Environmentalism?. Society & Natural Resources. 16(3). 221–238. 156 indexed citations

11.

Fly, J. Mark, et al.. (2000). Landowners' perceptions of white-tailed deer damage to crops in Tennessee. Insecta mundi. 1 indexed citations

12.

Jakus, Paul M., et al.. (1999). Fishing and Boating by Tennessee Residents in 1998 and 1999. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 1 indexed citations

13.

Jones, Robert E., J. Mark Fly, & H. Ken Cordell. (1999). How Green is My Valley? Tracking Rural and Urban Environmentalism in the Southern Appalachian Ecoregion¹. Rural Sociology. 64(3). 482–499. 53 indexed citations

14.

Jakus, Paul M., et al.. (1998). Fish Consumption Advisories: Incorporating Angler‐Specific Knowledge, Habits, and Catch Rates in a Site Choice Model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 80(5). 1019–1024. 19 indexed citations

15.

Jakus, Paul M., et al.. (1997). Estimating tennessee residents’ willingness to pay forTeaming with wildlife. Human Dimensions of Wildlife. 2(3). 16–26. 2 indexed citations

16.

Jakus, Paul M., Mark Downing, Mark S. Bevelhimer, & J. Mark Fly. (1997). Do Sportfish Consumption Advisories Affect Reservoir Anglers’ Site Choice?. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. 26(2). 196–204. 31 indexed citations

17.

Jakus, Paul M., et al.. (1996). Explaining Public Support for Fisheries Management Alternatives. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 16(1). 41–48. 7 indexed citations

18.

West, Patrick C., et al.. (1988). The Communication and Diffusion of NIPF Management Strategies. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry. 5(4). 265–270. 39 indexed citations

19.

Fly, J. Mark. (1986). Nature, Outdoor Recreation, and Tourism: the Basis for Regional Population Growth in Northern Lower Michigan.. Deep Blue (University of Michigan). 2 indexed citations

20.

Marans, Robert W. & J. Mark Fly. (1981). Recreation and the quality of urban life. Recreational resources, behaviors, and evaluations of people in the Detroit region.. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact