Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Axial Double Probe and Fields Signal Processing for the MMS Mission
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Macri's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Macri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Macri more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Macri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Macri. The network helps show where J. Macri may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Macri
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Macri.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Macri based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. Macri. J. Macri is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Woolf, Richard S., U. Bravar, Paul Bruillard, et al.. (2009). Test and simulation of a Fast Neutron Imaging Telescope. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 603(3). 406–414.8 indexed citations
Ryan, J. M., Peter F. Bloser, J. Macri, & M. McConnell. (2007). Using LaX scintillator in a new low-background Compton telescope. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6707. 670703–670703.4 indexed citations
Bravar, U., Paul Bruillard, E. O. Flückiger, et al.. (2006). FNIT: the fast neutron imaging telescope for SNM detection. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6213. 62130G–62130G.7 indexed citations
8.
Bravar, U., Paul Bruillard, E. O. Flückiger, et al.. (2006). Development of the Fast Neutron Imaging Telescope. University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester). 1. 107–111.10 indexed citations
9.
Bravar, U., Paul Bruillard, E. O. Flueckiger, et al.. (2005). Imaging solar neutrons below 10 MeV in the inner heliosphere. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5901. 59010I–59010I.5 indexed citations
10.
Cherry, M. L., G. L. Case, J. Cravens, et al.. (2004). CASTER: A Scintillator-Based Black Hole Finder Probe. 8.1 indexed citations
11.
Macri, J., L.A. Hamel, R. S. Miller, et al.. (2004). Single-sided CZT strip detectors. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 51(5). 2453–2460.8 indexed citations
12.
Desorgher, L., et al.. (2001). Geant Monte Carlo Simulation of the SONTRAC detector. ICRC. 8. 3065.1 indexed citations
13.
Macri, J., et al.. (2000). A Modular Hard X-Ray Polarimeter for Solar Flares. ASPC. 206. 280.5 indexed citations
Macri, J., et al.. (1996). Progress in the development of large area sub-millimeter resolution CdZnTe strip detectors. Civil War Book Review.5 indexed citations
19.
Ryan, J. M., V. Schöenfelder, R. Diehl, et al.. (1986). Solar Neutron Spectroscopy with COMPTEL on the Gamma Ray Observatory. ICRC. 18. 425.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.