J. Lykken

52.3k total citations
13 papers, 424 citations indexed

About

J. Lykken is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Lykken has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 424 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 2 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 1 paper in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in J. Lykken's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (11 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (6 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers). J. Lykken is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (11 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (6 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers). J. Lykken collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Switzerland. J. Lykken's co-authors include Gordon Kane, Michal Brhlik, Lisa L. Everett, Syomantak Chaudhuri, G. Hockney, Brent Nelson, Lian-Tao Wang, R. Keith Ellis, Christopher T. Hill and S. Mrenna and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nuclear Physics B and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

J. Lykken

13 papers receiving 415 citations

Peers

J. Lykken

NHEP

AA

SNP

PMH

AI

Athanasios Koukoutsakis United Kingdom

P.H. Frampton United States

O. S. AbouZeid Canada

Sebastian Scheffler Germany

Alessio Maiezza Italy

Kajia Yuan United States

D. Y. Bardin Russia

Minho Son South Korea

Joris Raeymaekers Czechia

Athanasios Koukoutsakis United Kingdom

J. Lykken

360 ×0.9

NHEP

29 ×0.3

AA

6 ×0.4

SNP

5 ×0.4

PMH

10 ×0.9

AI

Citations per year, relative to J. Lykken J. Lykken (= 1×) peers Athanasios Koukoutsakis

Countries citing papers authored by J. Lykken

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Lykken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Lykken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Lykken more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Lykken

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Lykken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Lykken. The network helps show where J. Lykken may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Lykken

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Lykken. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Lykken based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Lykken. J. Lykken is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Sekmen, S., Sabine Kraml, J. Lykken, et al.. (2012). Interpreting LHC SUSY searches in the phenomenological MSSM. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2012(2). 49 indexed citations

2.

Lykken, J., et al.. (2009). Light scalar as the messenger of electroweak and flavor symmetry breaking. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 79(7). 11 indexed citations

3.

Binétruy, Pierre, Gordon Kane, J. Lykken, & Brett D. Nelson. (2005). Twenty-five questions for string theorists. Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics. 32(2). 129–149. 12 indexed citations

4.

Kane, Gordon, et al.. (2003). Theory-motivated benchmark models and superpartners at the Fermilab Tevatron. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 67(4). 27 indexed citations

5.

Kane, Gordon, J. Lykken, Brent Nelson, & Lian-Tao Wang. (2002). Re-examination of electroweak symmetry breaking in supersymmetry and implications for light superpartners. Physics Letters B. 551(1-2). 146–160. 37 indexed citations

6.

Brhlik, Michal, Lisa L. Everett, Gordon Kane, & J. Lykken. (2000). Superstring theory andCP-violating phases: Can they be related?. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 62(3). 49 indexed citations

7.

Brhlik, Michal, Lisa L. Everett, Gordon Kane, & J. Lykken. (1999). Resolution to the SupersymmetricCPProblem with Large Soft Phases via D-Branes. Physical Review Letters. 83(11). 2124–2127. 85 indexed citations

8.

Lykken, J., T. E. Montroy, & S. Willenbrock. (1998). Group-theoretic evidence for SO(10) grand unification. Physics Letters B. 418(1-2). 141–144. 4 indexed citations

9.

Chaudhuri, Syomantak, et al.. (1995). String consistency for unified model building. Nuclear Physics B. 456(1-2). 89–129. 83 indexed citations

10.

Ellis, R. Keith, Christopher T. Hill, & J. Lykken. (1992). Perspectives in the standard model. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 23(5). 473–8. 27 indexed citations

11.

Chaudhuri, Syomantak, et al.. (1991). THE PENNER MATRIX MODEL AND c = 1 STRINGS. Modern Physics Letters A. 6(18). 1665–1677. 21 indexed citations

12.

Lykken, J.. (1982). Baryons in a large-Nmatrix model. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 25(6). 1653–1660. 3 indexed citations

13.

Iacono, William G., et al.. (1981). Measuring Deviant Eye Tracking. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 7(2). 204–205. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact