J. K. Critser

779 total citations
8 papers, 598 citations indexed

About

J. K. Critser is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine and Management of Technology and Innovation. According to data from OpenAlex, J. K. Critser has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 598 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 3 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 1 paper in Management of Technology and Innovation. Recurrent topics in J. K. Critser's work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (5 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (3 papers) and Blood donation and transfusion practices (1 paper). J. K. Critser is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Biology and Fertility (5 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (3 papers) and Blood donation and transfusion practices (1 paper). J. K. Critser collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Belgium. J. K. Critser's co-authors include Donghong Gao, Dayong Gao, E. Van den Abbeel, A. Van Steirteghem, Jingyu Liu, Yüksel Ağca, Ulrich Schneider, Charles Benson, Jinhui Tao and John J. McGrath and has published in prestigious journals such as Human Reproduction, Fertility and Sterility and Reproduction.

In The Last Decade

J. K. Critser

8 papers receiving 570 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. K. Critser United States	6	296	252	146	88	69	8	598
Mary St.John Douglas United States	3	153 0.5×	109 0.4×	99 0.7×	52 0.6×	36 0.5×	5	377
Michael J. Russo United States	5	127 0.4×	57 0.2×	202 1.4×	99 1.1×	34 0.5×	12	532
Igor I. Katkov United States	15	828 2.8×	793 3.1×	205 1.4×	111 1.3×	186 2.7×	27	1.2k
G. Kamp Germany	14	124 0.4×	171 0.7×	93 0.6×	269 3.1×	38 0.6×	22	715
Luciano Andrade Silva Brazil	22	409 1.4×	205 0.8×	235 1.6×	34 0.4×	77 1.1×	52	1.3k
F.M.F. van Dissel-Emiliani Netherlands	16	361 1.2×	453 1.8×	436 3.0×	109 1.2×	24 0.3×	23	929
Peter Kilbride United Kingdom	13	139 0.5×	55 0.2×	190 1.3×	143 1.6×	11 0.2×	36	543
A. Shimada Japan	14	283 1.0×	232 0.9×	227 1.6×	31 0.4×	53 0.8×	17	681
Glyn Stacey United Kingdom	11	82 0.3×	42 0.2×	271 1.9×	94 1.1×	28 0.4×	24	671
Maarten Hoogewijs Belgium	21	626 2.1×	641 2.5×	154 1.1×	170 1.9×	57 0.8×	58	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by J. K. Critser

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. K. Critser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. K. Critser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. K. Critser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. K. Critser

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. K. Critser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. K. Critser. The network helps show where J. K. Critser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. K. Critser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. K. Critser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. K. Critser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. K. Critser. J. K. Critser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Abbeel, E. Van den, Ulrich Schneider, Jingyu Liu, et al.. (2007). Osmotic responses and tolerance limits to changes in external osmolalities, and oolemma permeability characteristics, of human in vitro matured MII oocytes. Human Reproduction. 22(7). 1959–1972. 61 indexed citations

2.

Gao, Donghong & J. K. Critser. (2000). Mechanisms of Cryoinjury in Living Cells. ILAR Journal. 41(4). 187–196. 385 indexed citations

3.

Gao, Dayong, Hidehiko Matsubayashi, Xianwei Cui, et al.. (1999). Development of Optimal Techniques for Cryopreservation of Human Platelets. Cryobiology. 38(3). 225–235. 29 indexed citations

4.

Critser, J. K.. (1998). Current status of semen banking in the USA. Human Reproduction. 13(suppl 2). 55–67. 21 indexed citations

5.

Ağca, Yüksel, A.T. Peter, Donghong Gao, et al.. (1997). P-188 Fundamental cryobiology of mouse oocytes: Metaphase II membrane permeability characteristics at various temperatures in the presence of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Fertility and Sterility. 68. S182–S183. 2 indexed citations

6.

Gao, Dayong, John J. McGrath, Jinhui Tao, et al.. (1994). Membrane transport properties of mammalian oocytes: a micropipette perfusion technique. Reproduction. 102(2). 385–392. 54 indexed citations

7.

Du, Jie, Jun Tao, F.W. Kleinhans, Petr Mazúr, & J. K. Critser. (1994). Water volume and osmotic behaviour of mouse spermatozoa determined by electron paramagnetic resonance. Reproduction. 101(1). 37–42. 41 indexed citations

8.

Critser, J. K. & E.E. Noiles. (1993). Bioassays of Sperm Function. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. 11(1). 1–16. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact