J. J. Becker
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 1%
- Mechanical Engineering top 1%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 2%
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Condensed Matter Physics top 2%
- Co-authors
- R. AlbenF. E. LuborskyJ. L. WalterG. HofferJ. C. OlsonWerner OstertagK. StrnatH. H. Liebermann
- Topics
- Magnetic properties of thin films (26 papers)Magnetic Properties of Alloys (21 papers)Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (20 papers)
- Cited by
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic MaterialsCondensed Matter PhysicsAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
J. J. Becker
50 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.7k
- Mechanical Engineering 1.3k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.1k
- Materials Chemistry 536
- Condensed Matter Physics 507
Countries citing papers authored by J. J. Becker
This map shows the geographic impact of J. J. Becker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. J. Becker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. J. Becker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. J. Becker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. J. Becker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. J. Becker. The network helps show where J. J. Becker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. J. Becker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. J. Becker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. J. Becker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. J. Becker. J. J. Becker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 71 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Random anisotropy in amorphous ferromagnetsbreakdown → | 638 |
| 9 | 58 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 166 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| 18 | 47 | |
| 19 | 28 | |
| 20 | 60 |
About J. J. Becker
J. J. Becker is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (26 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (21 papers) and Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.7k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (507 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.1k citations). J. J. Becker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include R. Alben, F. E. Luborsky, J. L. Walter, G. Hoffer, J. C. Olson, Werner Ostertag, K. Strnat, H. H. Liebermann, A. V. Kimel and C. D. Graham. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Applied Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.