Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
2005640 citationsMargaret Brandwein‐Gensler, Miriam S. Teixeira et al.The American Journal of Surgical Pathologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J Hille's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J Hille with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J Hille more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J Hille. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J Hille. The network helps show where J Hille may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J Hille
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J Hille.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J Hille based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J Hille. J Hille is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Arotiba, Godwin Toyin, et al.. (2017). Ameloblastoma in Black Africans the Need for Multi-National Collaborative Research..5 indexed citations
2.
Ständer, Sonja, et al.. (2012). Oral medicine case book 40: oral histoplasmosis.. PubMed. 67(5). 230–3.1 indexed citations
3.
Titinchi, Fadi, et al.. (2011). The Diagnostic Accuracy of Autofluorescence Microscopy of Pap Smears for Oral Candidal Hyphae. 2(4). 28–33.1 indexed citations
Brandwein‐Gensler, Margaret, Miriam S. Teixeira, Carol M. Lewis, et al.. (2005). Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 29(2). 167–178.640 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Odell, Edward, Michael J. Aldred, Román Carlos, et al.. (2004). Clinico-Pathological Conference 2002. Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore. 33(4 Suppl). 53S–58S.6 indexed citations
7.
Brandwein‐Gensler, Margaret & J Hille. (2003). Behind the Cover: The Guthka Story. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 129(7). 699–699.2 indexed citations
Joseph, Christopher & J Hille. (1990). Kimura's disease--a benign condition that may be confused with malignancy. A case report.. PubMed. 28(3). 100–2.6 indexed citations
11.
Altini, M., J Hille, & Amos Buchner. (1986). Plexiform granular cell odontogenic tumor. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology. 61(2). 163–167.12 indexed citations
12.
Hille, J, et al.. (1985). Oral Kaposi's sarcoma in a patient with the acquired immune deficiency syndrome. A case report with notes on management and safety.. PubMed. 40(6). 321–5.1 indexed citations
13.
Touyz, Louis Z.G. & J Hille. (1984). A fruit—mouthwash chemical burn. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology. 58(3). 290–292.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.