J. Hill
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Co-authors
- Alireza GharabaghiBernhard SchölkopfManuel Gomez-RodriguezJan PetersMoritz Grosse‐WentrupNiels BirbaumerMichael BenschSebastian Halder
- Topics
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (12 papers)Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (6 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
J. Hill
12 papers receiving 397 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Cognitive Neuroscience 380
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 215
- Biomedical Engineering 98
- Human-Computer Interaction 73
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 64
Countries citing papers authored by J. Hill
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Hill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Hill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Hill. The network helps show where J. Hill may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Hill
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Hill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Hill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Hill. J. Hill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | 140 | |
| 3 | 55 | |
| 4 | Combining Real-Time Brain-Computer Interfacing and Robot Control for Stroke Rehabilitation | 1 |
| 5 | 135 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | Impact of target-to-target interval on classification performance in the P300 speller | 2 |
| 10 | Learning Optimal EEG Features Across Time, Frequency and Space | 6 |
| 11 | New Methods for the P300 Visual Speller | 3 |
| 12 | 6 |
About J. Hill
J. Hill is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, having authored 12 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (12 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (6 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (380 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (73 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (215 citations). J. Hill has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Alireza Gharabaghi, Bernhard Schölkopf, Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez, Jan Peters, Moritz Grosse‐Wentrup, Niels Birbaumer, Michael Bensch, Sebastian Halder, Bernhard Schoelkopf and Femke Nijboer. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Neurophysiology, Journal of Neural Engineering and IEEE Pulse.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.