J Griebel

646 total citations
29 papers, 485 citations indexed

About

J Griebel is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, J Griebel has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 485 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 8 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 6 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in J Griebel's work include MRI in cancer diagnosis (9 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (9 papers) and Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (8 papers). J Griebel is often cited by papers focused on MRI in cancer diagnosis (9 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (9 papers) and Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (8 papers). J Griebel collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. J Griebel's co-authors include Gunnar Brix, Richard R. Veit, Gilbert G. Stamm, Ursula Lechel, H D Nagel, M. Galanski, E. Nekolla, Thomas Gneiting, G Brix and P. Lukáš and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Cancer, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and European Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

J Griebel

26 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J Griebel Germany 7 417 220 73 56 44 29 485
David C. Spelic United States 10 320 0.8× 206 0.9× 106 1.5× 29 0.5× 38 0.9× 22 410
Saravanabavaan Suntharalingam Germany 13 458 1.1× 221 1.0× 146 2.0× 36 0.6× 69 1.6× 21 604
M Roskopf United States 10 357 0.9× 259 1.2× 127 1.7× 17 0.3× 49 1.1× 27 469
M-O Bernier France 5 236 0.6× 62 0.3× 61 0.8× 52 0.9× 100 2.3× 7 432
Johanna M. Meulepas Netherlands 7 226 0.5× 80 0.4× 48 0.7× 22 0.4× 49 1.1× 9 326
Stylianos Argentos Greece 12 274 0.7× 193 0.9× 167 2.3× 29 0.5× 71 1.6× 23 462
Neige Journy France 9 311 0.7× 97 0.4× 62 0.8× 18 0.3× 44 1.0× 13 373
L. N. Rothenberg United States 10 382 0.9× 200 0.9× 164 2.2× 28 0.5× 37 0.8× 31 479
Anna Płachcińska Poland 12 234 0.6× 76 0.3× 117 1.6× 56 1.0× 97 2.2× 52 442
Myriam Monsieurs Belgium 13 417 1.0× 48 0.2× 174 2.4× 31 0.6× 65 1.5× 22 590

Countries citing papers authored by J Griebel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J Griebel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J Griebel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J Griebel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J Griebel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J Griebel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J Griebel. The network helps show where J Griebel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J Griebel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J Griebel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J Griebel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J Griebel. J Griebel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Nekolla, E., et al.. (2020). Wissenschaftliche Bewertung und rechtliche Zulassung von radiologischen Früherkennungsuntersuchungen in Deutschland. Der Radiologe. 61(1). 21–27. 3 indexed citations
3.
Nekolla, E., Alexander Schegerer, J Griebel, & Gunnar Brix. (2017). Häufigkeit und Dosis diagnostischer und interventioneller Röntgenanwendungen. Der Radiologe. 57(7). 555–562. 35 indexed citations
4.
Brix, Gunnar, J Griebel, & Stefan Delorme. (2012). Dynamische kontrastverstärkte Computertomographie. Der Radiologe. 52(3). 277–298. 2 indexed citations
5.
Langer, Mathias, et al.. (2012). Neuerungen im Genehmigungsverfahren „Medizinische Forschung“ gemäß Röntgen- und Strahlenschutzverordnung. RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren. 184(6). 513–519.
6.
Griebel, J, et al.. (2011). Welchen Einfluss hat die Einführung des Mammographie-Screening-Programms auf die Häufigkeit von Mammographie-Untersuchungen?. RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren. 183(S 01). 1 indexed citations
7.
Nekolla, E., J Griebel, & Gunnar Brix. (2010). Strahlenhygiene in der medizinischen Röntgenbildgebung: Teil 3: Strahlenexposition des Patienten und Risikobewertung. Der Radiologe. 50(11). 1039–1052. 1 indexed citations
8.
Nekolla, E., J Griebel, & Gunnar Brix. (2010). Strahlenhygiene in der medizinischen Röntgenbildgebung. Der Radiologe. 50(11). 1039–1054. 4 indexed citations
9.
Griebel, J, et al.. (2005). [Introduction of a mammography screening program in Germany. Consideration of benefits and risks].. Der Radiologe. 45(3). 245–54. 6 indexed citations
10.
Brix, Gunnar, E. Nekolla, & J Griebel. (2005). Strahlenexposition von Patienten durch diagnostische und interventionelle Röntgenanwendungen. Der Radiologe. 45(4). 340–349. 19 indexed citations
11.
Brix, Gunnar, Ursula Lechel, Richard R. Veit, et al.. (2004). Assessment of a theoretical formalism for dose estimation in CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study. European Radiology. 14(7). 1275–84. 86 indexed citations
12.
Hein, Patrick A., Christian Kremser, Werner Judmaier, et al.. (2003). Diffusionsgewichtete Magnetresonanztomographie - Ein neuer Prognoseparameter beim fortgeschrittenen Rektumkarzinom?. RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren. 175(3). 381–386. 15 indexed citations
13.
Brix, Gunnar, H D Nagel, Gilbert G. Stamm, et al.. (2003). Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey. European Radiology. 13(8). 1979–1991. 159 indexed citations
14.
Englmeier, Karl‐Hans, et al.. (2003). Dynamic MR-Mammography in Virtual Reality. Studies in health technology and informatics. 94. 72–8. 3 indexed citations
15.
DeVries, A., Patrick A. Hein, Christian Kremser, et al.. (2002). Tumor microcirculation and diffusion predicts therapy outcome for primary rectal carcinoma undergoing combined chemoradiation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 54(2). 29–29. 1 indexed citations
16.
Brix, G, O. Schulz, & J Griebel. (2002). Begrenzung der HF-Exposition von Patienten bei MR-Untersuchungen. Der Radiologe. 42(1). 51–61. 3 indexed citations
17.
Pahernik, Sascha, J Griebel, Andreas Botzlar, et al.. (2001). Quantitative imaging of tumour blood flow by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. British Journal of Cancer. 85(11). 1655–1663. 25 indexed citations
18.
Griebel, J, Christian Kremser, Werner Judmaier, et al.. (2001). Tumor microcirculation evaluated by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging predicts therapy outcome for primary rectal carcinoma.. PubMed. 61(6). 2513–6. 95 indexed citations
19.
Kummermehr, J., et al.. (1995). The proliferative capacity of mouse fibrosarcoma cells that survived x-irradiation. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics. 34(4). 233–237. 6 indexed citations
20.
Bühler, K., et al.. (1987). Differentialdiagnose von Ovarialtumoren — hilft dem Gynäkologen die NMR-Tomographie. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 242(1-4). 858–859.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026