J E Decker

879 total citations
36 papers, 696 citations indexed

About

J E Decker is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Mechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, J E Decker has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 696 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 16 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 11 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in J E Decker's work include Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (19 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (16 papers) and Optical measurement and interference techniques (10 papers). J E Decker is often cited by papers focused on Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (19 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (16 papers) and Optical measurement and interference techniques (10 papers). J E Decker collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Germany and United States. J E Decker's co-authors include S. L. Chin, F. A. Ilkov, B J Eves, You Liang, M. V. Ammosov, Guoying Xu, R J W Douglas, Andrew Lewis, Paola Nisticò and P. Juncar and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, Measurement Science and Technology and Measurement.

In The Last Decade

J E Decker

34 papers receiving 614 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J E Decker Canada	13	440	216	206	168	108	36	696
Y. Salvadé Switzerland	11	315 0.7×	33 0.2×	206 1.0×	91 0.5×	39 0.4×	27	485
Shuko Yokoyama Japan	15	500 1.1×	285 1.3×	142 0.7×	49 0.3×	29 0.3×	30	703
Osama Terra Egypt	13	1.0k 2.3×	92 0.4×	77 0.4×	81 0.5×	9 0.1×	46	1.2k
Arnold Nicolaus Germany	13	60 0.1×	20 0.1×	133 0.6×	461 2.7×	62 0.6×	35	593
Theodore D. Doiron United States	10	84 0.2×	12 0.1×	100 0.5×	64 0.4×	36 0.3×	32	312
C M Sutton New Zealand	13	50 0.1×	10 0.0×	129 0.6×	293 1.7×	26 0.2×	38	437
H. Fang France	18	87 0.2×	21 0.1×	64 0.3×	416 2.5×	4 0.0×	47	591
Atsushi Waseda Japan	15	72 0.2×	7 0.0×	68 0.3×	298 1.8×	13 0.1×	46	590
George R. Jones United States	13	305 0.7×	6 0.0×	23 0.1×	101 0.6×	11 0.1×	40	545
Mark Bieler Germany	16	441 1.0×	93 0.4×	27 0.1×	28 0.2×	12 0.1×	82	775

Countries citing papers authored by J E Decker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J E Decker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J E Decker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J E Decker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J E Decker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J E Decker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J E Decker. The network helps show where J E Decker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J E Decker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J E Decker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J E Decker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J E Decker. J E Decker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Haine, Eleanor R., Hilary B. Bergsieker, Imogen R. Coe, et al.. (2020). Enacting workplace culture change for excellence in research: a gender lens. FACETS. 5(1). 228–233. 2 indexed citations

Decker, J E, et al.. (2012). Final report on SIM Regional Key Comparison SIM.L-K1.2007: Calibration of gauge blocks by optical interferometry. Metrologia. 49(1A). 4010–4010. 1 indexed citations

Decker, J E, et al.. (2010). Evaluation of uncertainty in grating pitch measurement by optical diffraction using Monte Carlo methods. Measurement Science and Technology. 22(2). 27001–27001. 13 indexed citations

Decker, J E, Andrew Lewis, M G Cox, A G Steele, & R J W Douglas. (2010). A recommended method for evaluation of international comparison results. Measurement. 43(6). 852–856. 1 indexed citations

Eves, B J, et al.. (2008). Uncertainty evaluation of the NRC imaging diffractometer. Measurement Science and Technology. 19(7). 75103–75103. 7 indexed citations

Decker, J E, A G Steele, Harald Bosse, & R J W Douglas. (2008). Analysing redundancy in a line scale comparison using Monte Carlo methods. Measurement Science and Technology. 19(6). 64005–64005. 2 indexed citations

Decker, J E, A G Steele, & R J W Douglas. (2008). Measurement science and the linking of CIPM and regional key comparisons. Metrologia. 45(2). 223–232. 5 indexed citations

Decker, J E, et al.. (2007). Final Report on SIM.L-K1 (SIM.4.2) Regional Comparison. Stage One: Calibration of gauge blocks by optical interferometry. Metrologia. 44(1A). 4001–4001. 1 indexed citations

Eves, B J, et al.. (2007). Imaging laser diffractometer for traceable grating pitch calibration. Measurement Science and Technology. 18(2). 375–383. 26 indexed citations

10.

Decker, J E, Andrew Lewis, M G Cox, A G Steele, & R J W Douglas. (2006). Evaluating results of international comparisons: worked example of CCL-K2 comparison of long gauge block calibration.. UCL Discovery (University College London). 2 indexed citations

11.

Decker, J E, Nicholas A. T. Brown, M G Cox, A G Steele, & R J W Douglas. (2006). Recent recommendations of the Consultative Committee for Length (CCL) regarding strategies for evaluating key comparison data. Metrologia. 43(6). L51–L55. 14 indexed citations

12.

Decker, J E, et al.. (2003). Increasing the range of unambiguity in step-height measurement with multiple-wavelength interferometry—application to absolute long gauge block measurement. Applied Optics. 42(28). 5670–5670. 41 indexed citations

13.

Decker, J E, et al.. (2003). Next-generation Kosters interferometer. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5190. 14–14. 12 indexed citations

14.

Decker, J E & Nicholas A. T. Brown. (2001). Recent Developments in Traceable Dimensional Measurements II. 4401. 5 indexed citations

15.

Decker, J E, et al.. (1999). NORAMET comparison of gauge block measurement by optical interferometry. Metrologia. 36(5). 421–432. 2 indexed citations

16.

Decker, J E, et al.. (1998). Recent Developments in Optical Gauge Block Metrology. 3477. 2 indexed citations

17.

Decker, J E, et al.. (1996). Development of improved electrical-substitution radiometers at the National Research Council of Canada. Applied Optics. 35(19). 3607–3607. 1 indexed citations

18.

Decker, J E, et al.. (1993). Tunnel ionization of simple molecules by an intense CO₂laser. Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics. 26(4). L85–L90. 48 indexed citations

19.

Ilkov, F. A., J E Decker, & S. L. Chin. (1992). Ionization of atoms in the tunnelling regime with experimental evidence using Hg atoms. Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics. 25(19). 4005–4020. 168 indexed citations

20.

Decker, J E, Guoying Xu, & S. L. Chin. (1992). Intense CO₂laser ionization of D₂O and (D₂O)₂. Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics. 25(14). 3117–3132. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact