Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Indus–Yarlung Zangbo ophiolites from Nanga Parbat to Namche Barwa syntaxes, southern Tibet: First synthesis of petrology, geochemistry, and geochronology with incidences on geodynamic reconstructions of Neo-Tethys
2011371 citationsRéjean Hébert, Carl Guilmette et al.Gondwana Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Dostál's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Dostál with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Dostál more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Dostál. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Dostál. The network helps show where J. Dostál may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Dostál
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Dostál.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Dostál based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. Dostál. J. Dostál is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dostál, J., et al.. (2013). Results of grand fir (Abies grandis/Douglas ex D. Don/Lindl.) provenances evaluation on the locality Strnady-Gamapole at the age of 28 years.. 58(1). 58–65.1 indexed citations
7.
Dostál, J., et al.. (2012). Growth evaluation of provenances of exotic fir species at the age of 36-41 years.. 57(2). 151–159.
Keppie, J. Duncan, et al.. (2009). Carboniferous tholeiitic dikes in the Salada unit, Acatlán Complex, southern Mexico: A record of extension on the western margin of Pangea. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.8 indexed citations
Guilmette, Carl, et al.. (2007). Strongly foliated garnetiferous amphibolite clasts in ophiolitic melanges, Yarlung Zangbo Suture Zone, Tibet; Early Cretaceous disruption of a back-arc basin?. AGUFM. 2007.4 indexed citations
13.
Dostál, J., et al.. (2005). Field Trip B3: Geology and Volcanology of the Jurassic North Mountain Basalt, Southern Nova Scotia.1 indexed citations
14.
Greenough, John D., et al.. (2005). Igneous Rock Associations 4. Oceanic Island Volcanism I Mineralogy and Petrology. Geoscience Canada. 32(1).3 indexed citations
15.
Greenough, John D., et al.. (2005). Igneous Rock Associations 5. Oceanic Island Volcanism II: Mantle Processes. Geoscience Canada. 32(2).22 indexed citations
16.
Hébert, Réjean, et al.. (2001). Geodynamics of Yarlung Zangbo Suture Zone (YZSZ): Implications for Origin of Related Tibetan Ophiolites. AGUFM. 2001.6 indexed citations
Dupuy, C., et al.. (1981). Distribution of copper and gold in ophiolites from New Caledonia. The Canadian Mineralogist. 19(2). 225–232.5 indexed citations
20.
Dostál, J., Clive M. Elson, & C. Dupuy. (1979). Distribution of lead, silver and cadmium in some igneous rocks and their constituent minerals. The Canadian Mineralogist. 17(3). 561–567.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.