J. C. Read

452 total citations
10 papers, 368 citations indexed

About

J. C. Read is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, J. C. Read has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 368 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 7 papers in Materials Chemistry and 4 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in J. C. Read's work include Magnetic properties of thin films (8 papers), ZnO doping and properties (5 papers) and Semiconductor materials and devices (4 papers). J. C. Read is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic properties of thin films (8 papers), ZnO doping and properties (5 papers) and Semiconductor materials and devices (4 papers). J. C. Read collaborates with scholars based in United States and Egypt. J. C. Read's co-authors include R. A. Buhrman, David A. Muller, J. Judy, W. F. Egelhoff, Yi Li, H. W. Tseng, Pinshane Y. Huang, P. M. Braganca, P. G. Gowtham and Kwan Wee Tan and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Materials, Applied Physics Letters and Physical Review B.

In The Last Decade

J. C. Read

10 papers receiving 359 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. C. Read United States	8	272	179	132	113	85	10	368
S. Zoll France	11	310 1.1×	94 0.5×	176 1.3×	135 1.2×	106 1.2×	32	373
L.W. Guo China	10	169 0.6×	215 1.2×	244 1.8×	102 0.9×	58 0.7×	21	397
Susumu Hashimoto Japan	7	212 0.8×	212 1.2×	117 0.9×	196 1.7×	47 0.6×	17	368
M. Cubukcu France	11	363 1.3×	228 1.3×	138 1.0×	194 1.7×	122 1.4×	24	463
A. Radulescu Belgium	6	276 1.0×	193 1.1×	110 0.8×	132 1.2×	75 0.9×	7	402
M. Vieth Germany	11	338 1.2×	124 0.7×	219 1.7×	179 1.6×	86 1.0×	20	440
Р. Р. Гареев Germany	11	305 1.1×	143 0.8×	95 0.7×	194 1.7×	88 1.0×	21	372
N. F. Kharchenko Ukraine	11	162 0.6×	116 0.6×	166 1.3×	186 1.6×	114 1.3×	64	344
Baoxue Bo China	10	215 0.8×	156 0.9×	361 2.7×	31 0.3×	62 0.7×	80	422
F. Ernult Japan	11	406 1.5×	133 0.7×	152 1.2×	206 1.8×	129 1.5×	24	474

Countries citing papers authored by J. C. Read

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. C. Read's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. C. Read with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. C. Read more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. C. Read

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. C. Read. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. C. Read. The network helps show where J. C. Read may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. C. Read

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. C. Read. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. C. Read based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. C. Read. J. C. Read is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Pomeroy, J. M. & J. C. Read. (2011). Magnetic switching fluctuations from sidewall oxides in MgO/FeCoB magnetic tunnel junctions. Applied Physics Letters. 99(9). 1 indexed citations

2.

Lau, June W., Paul E. Morrow, J. C. Read, et al.. (2010). In situ tunneling measurements in a transmission electron microscope on nanomagnetic tunnel junctions. Applied Physics Letters. 96(26). 4 indexed citations

3.

Pomeroy, J. M., et al.. (2009). Magnetoresistance based first-order reversal curve analysis of magnetic tunnel junctions. Applied Physics Letters. 95(2). 8 indexed citations

4.

Read, J. C., J. Judy, W. F. Egelhoff, et al.. (2009). High magnetoresistance tunnel junctions with Mg–B–O barriers and Ni–Fe–B free electrodes. Applied Physics Letters. 94(11). 17 indexed citations

5.

Read, J. C., W. F. Egelhoff, Pinshane Y. Huang, et al.. (2009). Atomic-scale spectroscopic imaging of CoFeB/Mg–B–O/CoFeB magnetic tunnel junctions. Applied Physics Letters. 95(3). 32506–32506. 41 indexed citations

6.

Ozatay, O., P. G. Gowtham, Kwan Wee Tan, et al.. (2008). Sidewall oxide effects on spin-torque- and magnetic-field-induced reversal characteristics of thin-film nanomagnets. Nature Materials. 7(7). 567–573. 60 indexed citations

7.

Judy, J., J. C. Read, R. A. Buhrman, & David A. Muller. (2007). Spatially resolved electron energy-loss spectroscopy of electron-beam grown and sputtered CoFeB∕MgO∕CoFeB magnetic tunnel junctions. Applied Physics Letters. 91(6). 55 indexed citations

8.

Read, J. C., et al.. (2006). Disorder, defects, and band gaps in ultrathin (001) MgO tunnel barrier layers. Physical Review B. 73(20). 112 indexed citations

9.

Read, J. C., et al.. (2005). Tunneling spectroscopy studies of treated aluminum oxide tunnel barrier layers. Applied Physics Letters. 86(24). 16 indexed citations

10.

Read, J. C., et al.. (2005). Oxygen stoichiometry and instability in aluminum oxide tunnel barrier layers. Physical Review B. 71(16). 54 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact