This map shows the geographic impact of J C Morrison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J C Morrison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J C Morrison more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J C Morrison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J C Morrison. The network helps show where J C Morrison may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J C Morrison
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J C Morrison.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J C Morrison based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J C Morrison. J C Morrison is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Roberts, William E., et al.. (2001). Labor and membrane rupture in twin gestation. Can they affect the ability to estimate fetal weight?. PubMed. 46(5). 462–6.4 indexed citations
Rust, Orion A., James A. Bofill, Sean Carroll, et al.. (1998). Two-hour postprandial test versus one-hour, fifty-gram glucola test as screening tools for gestational diabetes: a critical analysis.. PubMed. 18(1). 49–54.9 indexed citations
4.
Bofill, James A., et al.. (1997). Neonatal cephalohematoma from vacuum extraction.. PubMed. 42(9). 565–9.34 indexed citations
5.
Chauhan, Suneet, Bryan D. Cowan, E. F. Magann, et al.. (1996). Intrapartum amniotic fluid index. A poor diagnostic test for adverse perinatal outcome.. PubMed. 41(11). 860–6.22 indexed citations
Magann, Everett F., et al.. (1995). Infectious morbidity, operative blood loss, and length of the operative procedure after cesarean delivery by method of placental removal and site of uterine repair.. PubMed. 181(6). 517–20.51 indexed citations
9.
Naef, Robert W., et al.. (1995). Hemorrhage associated with cesarean delivery: when is transfusion needed?. PubMed. 15(1). 32–5.25 indexed citations
10.
Chauhan, Suneet P., et al.. (1993). Intrapartum assessment by house staff of birth weight among twins.. PubMed. 82(4 Pt 1). 523–6.16 indexed citations
11.
Morrison, J C, et al.. (1993). Clinical application of the Kleihauer-Betke test.. PubMed. 38(8). 621–4.21 indexed citations
Morrison, J C, et al.. (1990). Correlation of urinary tract infection with urinary screening at the first antepartum visit.. PubMed. 31(10). 331–3.18 indexed citations
15.
Hess, L. Wayne, et al.. (1990). Correlation of uterine activity using the Term Guard monitor versus standard external tocodynamometry compared with the intrauterine pressure catheter.. PubMed. 76(1 Suppl). 52S–55S.9 indexed citations
16.
McCaul, James F., et al.. (1990). Stripping membranes at term: can it safely reduce the incidence of post-term pregnancies?. PubMed. 76(4). 678–80.34 indexed citations
17.
Rhodes, P, et al.. (1984). Treatment of premature rupture of the membranes.. PubMed. 29(10). 741–4.8 indexed citations
18.
Wiser, Winfred L., et al.. (1974). Management of bladder drainage following vaginal plastic repairs.. PubMed. 44(1). 65–71.20 indexed citations
19.
Morrison, J C. (1967). VAULT LACERATION DUE TO SNEEZING. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 74(5). 773–773.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.