Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Estimation of Root-knot Nematode Infestation Levels on Roots Using a Rating Chart
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Bridge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Bridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Bridge more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Bridge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Bridge. The network helps show where J. Bridge may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Bridge
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Bridge.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Bridge based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. Bridge. J. Bridge is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Papadikis, Konstantinos, et al.. (2017). Effect of air turbulence on gas transport in soil; comparison of approaches. Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses (University of Wolverhampton). 1674.1 indexed citations
Bridge, J., et al.. (1998). Plant parasitic nematodes of Irish potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) in Central Province and sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas) in Central, Nyanza and Coas^dot under~t Provinces of Kenya. 8(1). 21–26.4 indexed citations
11.
Bridge, J., David Hunt, & P. G. Hunt. (1996). Plant-Parasitic Nematodes of Crops in Belize. Nematropica. 26(2). 111–119.10 indexed citations
12.
Bridge, J., et al.. (1996). Radopholus citri n. sp. (Tylenchida : Pratylenchidae) and its pathogenicity on citrus. Fundamental & applied nematology. 19(2). 127–133.8 indexed citations
13.
Hahn, Marlene, et al.. (1994). Molecular diversity amongst Radopholus similis populations from Sri Lanka detected by RAPD analysis. Fundamental & applied nematology. 17(3). 275–281.17 indexed citations
14.
Page, Sam & J. Bridge. (1994). The African cotton-root nematode, Meloidogyne acronea; its pathogenicity and intra-generic infectivity within Gossypium. Fundamental & applied nematology. 17(1). 67–73.3 indexed citations
15.
Hunt, David, et al.. (1989). On Achlysiella, a new genus of obese Pratylenchidae (Nematoda: Tylenchoidea).. Revue de nématologie. 12(4). 401–407.9 indexed citations
16.
Bridge, J., et al.. (1984). Plant nematode pests of crops in Papua New Guinea.. Journal of Plant Protection. 1(2). 99–109.14 indexed citations
17.
Bridge, J., et al.. (1981). Hirschmanniella sp. an endoparasitic nematode associated with miti-miti disease of taro corms in the Solomon Islands.. 29. 9–11.5 indexed citations
Bridge, J., et al.. (1976). Meloidogyne acronea associated with reduced growth of cotton in Malawi.. The Plant disease reporter. 60(1). 5–7.2 indexed citations
20.
Bridge, J.. (1973). Hoplolaimus seinhorsti, an endoparasitic nematode of cowpea in Nigeria.. The Plant disease reporter. 57(9). 798–799.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.