Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Video coding with H.264/AVC: tools, performance, and complexity
2004606 citationsJörn Östermann, J. Bormans et al.IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazineprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Bormans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Bormans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Bormans more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Bormans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Bormans. The network helps show where J. Bormans may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Bormans
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Bormans.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Bormans based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. Bormans. J. Bormans is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Saponara, Sergio, et al.. (2004). Performance and Complexity Co-evaluation of the Advanced Video Coding Standard for Cost-Effective Multimedia Communications. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.44 indexed citations
3.
Östermann, Jörn, J. Bormans, Peter List, et al.. (2004). Video coding with H.264/AVC: tools, performance, and complexity. IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine. 4(1). 7–28.606 indexed citations breakdown →
Lafruit, Gauthier, et al.. (2002). Complexity Assessment of the AVC Codec with ATOMIUM. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles).
Saponara, Sergio, et al.. (2002). Data transfer and storage complexity analysis of the AVC/JVT Codec on a tool-by-tool basis. CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa). 1–24.3 indexed citations
Nachtergaele, Lode, Gauthier Lafruit, J. Bormans, & I. Bolsens. (2000). Fast software implementation of the MPEG-4 reversible integer wavelet transform on Pentium MMX, Sharc ADSP and Trimedia TM1000. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles).2 indexed citations
15.
Lafruit, Gauthier, et al.. (1999). A Scalable Architecture for MPEG-4 Wavelet Quantization. International Journal of Circuits Systems and Signal Processing. 23(1). 93–107.1 indexed citations
Nachtergaele, Lode, et al.. (1999). Study of the VM5.2 Memory Complexity for Cost Efficient Implementation. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel).3 indexed citations
Lafruit, Gauthier, et al.. (1998). Design of an Arithmetic coder for a Hardware Wavelet compression engine. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles).7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.