Countries citing papers authored by J. B. Chatterton
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of J. B. Chatterton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. B. Chatterton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. B. Chatterton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. B. Chatterton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. B. Chatterton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. B. Chatterton. The network helps show where J. B. Chatterton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. B. Chatterton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. B. Chatterton.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. B. Chatterton based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. B. Chatterton. J. B. Chatterton is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Penning‐Rowsell, Edmund C., Sally Priest, Dennis J. Parker, et al.. (2013). Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management: A Manual for Economic Appraisal. Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London).104 indexed citations
5.
Chatterton, J. B., Christophe Viavattene, Joe Morris, Edmund C. Penning‐Rowsell, & Sue Tapsell. (2010). The costs of the summer 2007 floods in England.. Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London).57 indexed citations
6.
Chatterton, J. B., et al.. (2009). Urban surface water management planning. Implementation issues..1 indexed citations
7.
Arnell, Nigel W. & J. B. Chatterton. (2007). 21 Reducing flood losses. Nature. 440(7087). 360–374.6 indexed citations
8.
Penning‐Rowsell, Edmund C., et al.. (2005). The Benefits of Flood and Coastal Risk Management: A Handbook of Assessment Techniques. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology).213 indexed citations
9.
Penning‐Rowsell, Edmund C., Sylvia Tunstall, Sue Tapsell, et al.. (2005). The benefits of flood and coastal risk management: a manual of assessment techniques (Multi-Coloured Handbook 2005).62 indexed citations
10.
Hall, Jim W., Richard Dawson, Paul Sayers, et al.. (2003). A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Maritime Engineering. 156(3). 235–247.162 indexed citations
11.
Sayers, Paul, Jim W. Hall, Richard Dawson, et al.. (2003). Risk assessment for flood and coastal defence systems for strategic planning (RASP) - a national scale application and a look forward to more detailed methods. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).4 indexed citations
Sayers, Paul, Jim W. Hall, Richard Dawson, et al.. (2003). Risk assessment for strategic planning (rasp) – a national scale application and a look forward to more detailed methods.1 indexed citations
14.
Sayers, Paul, Jim W. Hall, Richard Dawson, et al.. (2002). Risk assessment for flood and coastal defence for strategic planning: High level methodology: Evaluation report. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).2 indexed citations
15.
Sayers, Paul, Jim W. Hall, Richard Dawson, et al.. (2002). Risk assessment for flood and coastal defence systems for strategic planning (RASP) - a high level methodology. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.