I‐Wu Chu‐Wang

1.5k citations
17 papers · 1.3k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

I‐Wu Chu‐Wang

17 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

I‐Wu Chu‐Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Developmental Neuroscience 297
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 758
  • Insect Science 164
  • Cell Biology 194
  • Genetics 320
Replace O. Trujillo‐Cenóz with:
O. Trujillo‐Cenóz Uruguay
Jonathan M. Blagburn Puerto Rico
Ruth H. Nordlander United States
Andrés Collazo United States
C. M. Bate Australia
Yohei Shinmyo Japan
Richard C. Goris Japan
Stavroula Assimacopoulos United States
MJ Bastiani United States
John Scholes United Kingdom
I‐Wu Chu‐Wang relative to O. Trujillo‐Cenóz Uruguay O. Trujillo‐Cenóz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
O. Trujillo‐Cenóz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I‐Wu Chu‐Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I‐Wu Chu‐Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I‐Wu Chu‐Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I‐Wu Chu‐Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I‐Wu Chu‐Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I‐Wu Chu‐Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I‐Wu Chu‐Wang. The network helps show where I‐Wu Chu‐Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside I‐Wu Chu‐Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I‐Wu Chu‐Wang Line = papers co-authored together I‐Wu Chu‐Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1978282
2 1978181
3 1978140
4 1972122
5 197383
6 197576
7 197271
8 197370
9 197556
10 197747
11 197237
12 197532
13 198129
14 198022
15 197818
16 197315
17 197413

About I‐Wu Chu‐Wang

I‐Wu Chu‐Wang is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, Cell Biology, Developmental Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (8 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (8 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (5 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (3 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (297 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (758 citations), Insect Science (164 citations), Cell Biology (194 citations) and Genetics (320 citations). I‐Wu Chu‐Wang has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ronald W. Oppenheim, Rainer F. Foelix, R. C. Axtell, Jerome L. Maderdrut, Ludwig Beck, Daniel L. Kline, Paul B. Farel and R Oppenheim. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Tissue and Cell, Brain Research, Cell and Tissue Research and Journal of Parasitology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact