Ismail Kul

18 papers receiving 427 citations

Peers

Ismail Kul
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Catalysis 299
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 195
  • Filtration and Separation 34
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 18
  • Biomedical Engineering 269
Replace Félix Μ. Gaciño with:
Félix Μ. Gaciño Spain
Oriol Vilaseca Spain
Helena M.N.T. Avelino Portugal
Heiko Kremer Germany
Aleš Blahut Czechia
Astan Shahverdiyev Azerbaijan
Yunhao Sun China
A.Z. Francesconi Brazil
Malyanah Mohd Taib Malaysia
I. Johnson Portugal
Ismail Kul relative to Félix Μ. Gaciño Spain Félix Μ. Gaciño's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Félix Μ. Gaciño · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ismail Kul

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ismail Kul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ismail Kul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ismail Kul more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ismail Kul

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ismail Kul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ismail Kul. The network helps show where Ismail Kul may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Ismail Kul, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ismail Kul Line = papers co-authored together Ismail Kul links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201187
2 201459
3 201357
4 201541
5 199832
6 201127
7 201323
8 201521
9 201219
10 200017
11 200916
12 201412
13 200110
14 20046
15 20073
16 20042
17 20141
18 20121
19 20120

About Ismail Kul

Ismail Kul is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Catalysis, Organic Chemistry, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 19 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (11 papers), Ionic liquids properties and applications (10 papers), Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (8 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (7 papers), Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (3 papers), Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (2 papers), Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies (2 papers) and Fire dynamics and safety research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (299 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (195 citations), Filtration and Separation (34 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (18 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (269 citations). Ismail Kul has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Azerbaijan. Frequent co-authors include Egon Hassel, Javid Safarov, Astan Shahverdiyev, Adolph L. Beyerlein, Darryl D. DesMarteau, Martin Stephan, Monika Geppert‐Rybczyńska, Ilmutdin M. Abdulagatov, Krishna L. Bhat and Kolari S. Bhat. Their work appears in journals such as Fluid Phase Equilibria, The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Journal of Molecular Liquids and Chemie Ingenieur Technik.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact