Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: An overview
2003557 citationsIris F.A. Vis, René de KosterEuropean Journal of Operational Researchprofile →
Survey of research in the design and control of automated guided vehicle systems
2004542 citationsIris F.A. VisEuropean Journal of Operational Researchprofile →
A survey of literature on automated storage and retrieval systems
2008452 citationsKees Jan Roodbergen, Iris F.A. VisEuropean Journal of Operational Researchprofile →
Storage yard operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, and research directions
2013285 citationsHéctor J. Carlo, Iris F.A. Vis et al.European Journal of Operational Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Iris F.A. Vis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iris F.A. Vis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iris F.A. Vis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iris F.A. Vis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iris F.A. Vis. The network helps show where Iris F.A. Vis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Iris F.A. Vis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Iris F.A. Vis.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Iris F.A. Vis based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Iris F.A. Vis. Iris F.A. Vis is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Carlo, Héctor J., Iris F.A. Vis, & Kees Jan Roodbergen. (2013). Storage yard operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, and research directions. European Journal of Operational Research. 235(2). 412–430.285 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Bijvank, Marco & Iris F.A. Vis. (2012). Inventory control for point-of-use locations in hospitals. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.
10.
Carlo, Héctor J., et al.. (2012). A Comparison of Priority Rules for Non-passing Automated Stacking Cranes.1 indexed citations
Vis, Iris F.A., et al.. (2010). An integrative online ATM forecasting and replenishment model with a service level constraint. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).
Vis, Iris F.A., et al.. (2005). Dispatching and layout rules at an automated container terminal. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam).13 indexed citations
Vis, Iris F.A. & Kees Jan Roodbergen. (2004). Short term storage of goods in cross-docking operations. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam).4 indexed citations
20.
Vis, Iris F.A. & Russell D. Meller. (2004). Cross docking in houseplant distribution. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.