Inish O’Doherty

1.2k total citations
16 papers, 510 citations indexed

About

Inish O’Doherty is a scholar working on Surgery, Transplantation and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. According to data from OpenAlex, Inish O’Doherty has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 510 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Surgery, 6 papers in Transplantation and 4 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. Recurrent topics in Inish O’Doherty's work include Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (6 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (4 papers) and Diabetes and associated disorders (4 papers). Inish O’Doherty is often cited by papers focused on Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (6 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (4 papers) and Diabetes and associated disorders (4 papers). Inish O’Doherty collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Finland. Inish O’Doherty's co-authors include Frank C. Schroeder, Axel Bethke, Ujendra Kumar, R.K. Somvanshi, Donald L Riddle, Christopher R. Clarke, Sarah R. Hind, Diane Dunham, Elise G. Viox and Joshua A. Baccile and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Diabetologia and Organic Letters.

In The Last Decade

Inish O’Doherty

16 papers receiving 507 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Inish O’Doherty United States 10 244 135 68 57 47 16 510
Balaji Santhanam United States 14 45 0.2× 315 2.3× 26 0.4× 28 0.5× 20 514
Jana Šťastná Czechia 12 66 0.3× 174 1.3× 87 1.3× 12 0.2× 44 411
Xingyu She United States 5 54 0.2× 263 1.9× 222 3.3× 18 0.3× 6 417
Gargi Bhattacharyya United States 9 69 0.3× 325 2.4× 26 0.4× 8 0.1× 12 471
Laura Fontrodona Spain 10 52 0.2× 271 2.0× 228 3.4× 5 0.1× 12 481
Daniel B. Magner United States 12 69 0.3× 417 3.1× 273 4.0× 7 0.1× 15 746
Silvia Rossi Argentina 15 63 0.3× 376 2.8× 8 0.1× 20 0.4× 43 643
Sandra Müller Germany 15 44 0.2× 276 2.0× 23 0.3× 15 0.3× 19 502
A.M. Childress United States 7 79 0.3× 294 2.2× 195 2.9× 8 0.1× 10 453
Byung-Jae Park South Korea 10 39 0.2× 181 1.3× 167 2.5× 3 0.1× 13 366

Countries citing papers authored by Inish O’Doherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inish O’Doherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inish O’Doherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inish O’Doherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inish O’Doherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inish O’Doherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inish O’Doherty. The network helps show where Inish O’Doherty may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inish O’Doherty

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inish O’Doherty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inish O’Doherty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Inish O’Doherty. Inish O’Doherty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Podichetty, Jagdeep T., Jackson Burton, Stephan Schmidt, et al.. (2024). Type 1 diabetes prevention clinical trial simulator: Case reports of model‐informed drug development tool. CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology. 13(8). 1309–1316. 5 indexed citations
2.
Klein, Amanda, Alexandre Loupy, Mark D. Stegall, et al.. (2023). Qualifying a novel clinical trial endpoint (iBOX) predictive of long-term kidney transplant outcomes. American Journal of Transplantation. 23(10). 1496–1506. 14 indexed citations
3.
Klein, Amanda, Alexandre Loupy, Mark D. Stegall, et al.. (2023). Qualifying a Novel Clinical Trial Endpoint (iBOX) Predictive of Long-Term Kidney Transplant Outcomes. Transplant International. 36. 11951–11951. 8 indexed citations
4.
Podichetty, Jagdeep T., Jackson Burton, Patrick Lang, et al.. (2023). Disease progression joint model predicts time to type 1 diabetes onset: Optimizing future type 1 diabetes prevention studies. CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology. 12(7). 1016–1028. 11 indexed citations
5.
Frey, Eric C., Amanda Klein, Inish O’Doherty, et al.. (2023). Longitudinal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) modeling in long‐term renal function to inform clinical trial design in kidney transplantation. Clinical and Translational Science. 16(9). 1680–1690. 3 indexed citations
7.
Podichetty, Jagdeep T., et al.. (2022). Leveraging Real‐World Data for EMA Qualification of a Model‐Based Biomarker Tool to Optimize Type‐1 Diabetes Prevention Studies. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 111(5). 1133–1141. 5 indexed citations
8.
Mullin, Ariana P., Inish O’Doherty, Lynn D. Hudson, et al.. (2021). Effective Data Sharing as a Conduit for Advancing Medical Product Development. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science. 55(3). 591–600. 19 indexed citations
9.
Klein, Amanda, Rita R. Alloway, Renata Albrecht, et al.. (2021). The Role of Patient-reported Outcomes and Medication Adherence Assessment in Patient-focused Drug Development for Solid Organ Transplantation. Transplantation. 105(5). 941–944. 6 indexed citations
10.
Mannon, Roslyn B., Randall E. Morris, Michaël Abécassis, et al.. (2020). Use of biomarkers to improve immunosuppressive drug development and outcomes in renal organ transplantation: A meeting report. American Journal of Transplantation. 20(6). 1495–1502. 12 indexed citations
11.
Stegall, Mark D., Matthew J. Everly, Roslyn B. Mannon, et al.. (2018). The importance of drug safety and tolerability in the development of new immunosuppressive therapy for transplant recipients: The Transplant Therapeutics Consortium’s position statement. American Journal of Transplantation. 19(3). 625–632. 12 indexed citations
12.
Hind, Sarah R., Susan R. Strickler, Diane Dunham, et al.. (2016). Tomato receptor FLAGELLIN-SENSING 3 binds flgII-28 and activates the plant immune system. Nature Plants. 2(9). 16128–16128. 144 indexed citations
13.
Fadeyi, Olugbeminiyi, Mihir D. Parikh, Robert E. Kyne, et al.. (2016). Chemoselective Preparation of Clickable Aryl Sulfonyl Fluoride Monomers: A Toolbox of Highly Functionalized Intermediates for Chemical Biology Probe Synthesis. ChemBioChem. 17(20). 1925–1930. 46 indexed citations
14.
Manohar, Murli, Miaoying Tian, Magali Moreau, et al.. (2015). Identification of multiple salicylic acid-binding proteins using two high throughput screens. Frontiers in Plant Science. 5. 777–777. 113 indexed citations
15.
O’Doherty, Inish, R.K. Somvanshi, Axel Bethke, et al.. (2012). Interaction of structure-specific and promiscuous G-protein–coupled receptors mediates small-molecule signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109(25). 9917–9922. 86 indexed citations
16.
O’Doherty, Inish, Joshua J. Yim, Eric A. Schmelz, & Frank C. Schroeder. (2011). Synthesis of Caeliferins, Elicitors of Plant Immune Responses: Accessing Lipophilic Natural Products via Cross Metathesis. Organic Letters. 13(21). 5900–5903. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026