Countries citing papers authored by Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer. The network helps show where Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer. Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Quack, Sigrid, Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer, Karen A. Shire, & Anja Weiß. (2018). Transnationalisierung der Arbeit. MADOC (University of Mannheim).2 indexed citations
Schulz-Schaeffer, Ingo. (2016). The position fields of technology: a role-theoretical approach to socio-technical networks. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 27.1 indexed citations
8.
Schulz-Schaeffer, Ingo. (2013). Scenarios as Patterns of Orientation in Technology Development and Technology Assessment. Outline of a Research Program. 9(1). 23–44.5 indexed citations
9.
Schulz-Schaeffer, Ingo. (2008). Technik als sozialer Akteur und als soziale Institution: Sozialität von Technik statt Postsozialität. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 705–719.2 indexed citations
10.
Schulz-Schaeffer, Ingo. (2008). Deutung und Delegation: Handlungsträgerschaft von Technik als doppeltes Zuschreibungsphänomen. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 3135–3144.1 indexed citations
Schulz-Schaeffer, Ingo, et al.. (2006). Introduction: What Comes after Constructivism in Science and Technology Studies?. ANU Open Research (Australian National University).1 indexed citations
13.
Strübing, Jörg, et al.. (2004). Kooperation im Niemandsland. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks.4 indexed citations
14.
Schulz-Schaeffer, Ingo, Karl H. Hörning, & Julia Reuter. (2003). „Complex Modelling“. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. 55(3). 612–612.
15.
Schulz-Schaeffer, Ingo. (2002). Innovation durch Konzeptübertragung: der Rückgriff auf Bekanntes bei der Erzeugung technischer Neuerungen am Beispiel der Multiagentensystem-Forschung. Zeitschrift für Soziologie. 31(3). 232–251.3 indexed citations
16.
Schulz-Schaeffer, Ingo. (2000). Sozialtheorie der Technik. PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University).28 indexed citations
17.
Schulz-Schaeffer, Ingo. (2000). Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie: zur Koevolution von Gesellschaft, Natur und Technik. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 187–210.19 indexed citations
Malsch, Thomas, Michaël Florian, Michael Jonas, & Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer. (1996). Sozionik: Expeditionen ins Grenzgebiet zwischen Soziologie und Künstlicher Intelligenz. Institutional Repository (IHS Vienna). 10. 6–12.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.