Ingo Schmidt

76 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Ingo Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Mechanical Engineering 492
  • Mechanics of Materials 294
  • Instrumentation 35
  • Biomaterials 122
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 185
Replace Αντωνία Αντωνίου with:
Αντωνία Αντωνίου United States
Benjamin S. Adair United States
V. Vallé France
Jean‐Christophe Dupré France
Tsuchin Philip Chu United States
Katia Genovese Italy
P. Doumalin France
Sandro Barone Italy
Jérôme Molimard France
Satoru Yoneyama Japan
Ingo Schmidt relative to Αντωνία Αντωνίου United States Αντωνία Αντωνίου's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Αντωνία Αντωνίου · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ingo Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingo Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingo Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingo Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingo Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingo Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingo Schmidt. The network helps show where Ingo Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ingo Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ingo Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together Ingo Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016124
2 200368
3 199764
4 201361
5 200160
6 201558
7 202155
8 201447
9 198644
10 201542
11 200835
12 197834
13 200434
14 202033
15 199931
16 201730
17 197030
18 199829
19 200724
20 200723

About Ingo Schmidt

Ingo Schmidt is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Mechanical Engineering, Space and Planetary Science, Mechanics of Materials and Geology, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical measurement and interference techniques (9 papers), Ultra-Wideband Communications Technology (9 papers), Metal Alloys Wear and Properties (9 papers), Antenna Design and Analysis (8 papers), Metal Forming Simulation Techniques (8 papers), Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (7 papers), Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling (7 papers) and Elasticity and Material Modeling (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mechanical Engineering (492 citations), Mechanics of Materials (294 citations), Instrumentation (35 citations), Biomaterials (122 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (185 citations). Ingo Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Peter Kühmstedt, Gunther Notni, N.A. Fleck, Wolfgang Wagermaier, Peter Fratzl, Ralf Mueller, Thomas Seifert, Norbert Jost, Stefan Heist and Andreas Tünnermann. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Materials Research (formerly Zeitschrift fuer Metallkunde), Bone, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, Industrial Robot the international journal of robotics research and application and Computational Materials Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026