Ingo Reich

418 total citations
15 papers, 57 citations indexed

About

Ingo Reich is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Ingo Reich has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 57 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 7 papers in Language and Linguistics and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Ingo Reich's work include Natural Language Processing Techniques (8 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers) and Linguistic research and analysis (3 papers). Ingo Reich is often cited by papers focused on Natural Language Processing Techniques (8 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers) and Linguistic research and analysis (3 papers). Ingo Reich collaborates with scholars based in Germany. Ingo Reich's co-authors include Heiner Drenhaus and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology and Natural Language Semantics.

In The Last Decade

Ingo Reich

13 papers receiving 53 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ingo Reich Germany	5	43	27	22	10	9	15	57
Éva Dékány Hungary	5	56 1.3×	23 0.9×	10 0.5×	9 0.9×	13 1.4×	19	75
Marcela Depiante United States	2	71 1.7×	34 1.3×	31 1.4×	18 1.8×	12 1.3×	4	77
Reiko Vermeulen United Kingdom	5	45 1.0×	22 0.8×	24 1.1×	8 0.8×	8 0.9×	13	60
William Croft	2	58 1.3×	24 0.9×	22 1.0×	9 0.9×	11 1.2×	2	77
Kirsten Gengel	2	39 0.9×	19 0.7×	13 0.6×	6 0.6×	14 1.6×	3	41
Andrés Pablo Salanova Canada	5	58 1.3×	17 0.6×	23 1.0×	11 1.1×	15 1.7×	17	65
Gianluca Giorgolo United Kingdom	5	34 0.8×	62 2.3×	18 0.8×	8 0.8×	3 0.3×	16	79
Kim Gerdes France	5	27 0.6×	67 2.5×	16 0.7×	14 1.4×	17 1.9×	18	85
David A Peterson United States	5	84 2.0×	20 0.7×	24 1.1×	12 1.2×	30 3.3×	8	104
Anamaria Fălăuş France	7	83 1.9×	34 1.3×	20 0.9×	22 2.2×	17 1.9×	19	99

Countries citing papers authored by Ingo Reich

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingo Reich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingo Reich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingo Reich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingo Reich

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingo Reich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingo Reich. The network helps show where Ingo Reich may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ingo Reich

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ingo Reich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ingo Reich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ingo Reich. Ingo Reich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

1.

Drenhaus, Heiner, et al.. (2021). The Role of UID for the Usage of Verb Phrase Ellipsis: Psycholinguistic Evidence From Length and Context Effects. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 661087–661087. 4 indexed citations

2.

Reich, Ingo, et al.. (2021). Modeling the predictive potential of extralinguistic context with script knowledge: The case of fragments. PLoS ONE. 16(2). e0246255–e0246255. 2 indexed citations

3.

Reich, Ingo, et al.. (2021). Predictable Words Are More Likely to Be Omitted in Fragments–Evidence From Production Data. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 662125–662125. 1 indexed citations

4.

Reich, Ingo, et al.. (2018). What is dropped in Topic Drop? – A rating study on the relationship between Topicality and Topic Drop in German. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations

5.

Reich, Ingo, et al.. (2017). Optimal encoding! - Information Theory constrains article omission in newspaper headlines. 131–135. 3 indexed citations

6.

Reich, Ingo. (2017). On the omission of articles and copulae in German newspaper headlines. 17(2). 186–204. 3 indexed citations

7.

Reich, Ingo, et al.. (2017). The Fragment Corpus (FraC). Universität des Saarlandes. 2 indexed citations

8.

Reich, Ingo, et al.. (2016). On "Article Omission" in German and the "Uniform Information Density Hypothesis".. 1 indexed citations

9.

Reich, Ingo, et al.. (2016). Einführung in die Semantik. J.B. Metzler eBooks.

10.

Reich, Ingo. (2009). "Asymmetrische Koordination" im Deutschen. 6 indexed citations

11.

Reich, Ingo. (2009). What Asymmetric Coordination in German tells us about the syntax and semantics of conditionals. Natural Language Semantics. 17(3). 219–244. 3 indexed citations

12.

Reich, Ingo. (2004). Association with Focus and Choice Functions ? A Binding Approach. 2(3). 463–489. 5 indexed citations

13.

Reich, Ingo. (2003). Frage, Antwort und Fokus. 10 indexed citations

14.

Reich, Ingo. (2002). Question/Answer Congruence and the Semantics of wh-phrases. Theoretical Linguistics. 28(1). 15 indexed citations

15.

Reich, Ingo. (2001). Question/answer congruence and the semantics of wh-phrases. ZAS Papers in Linguistics. 23. 181–195. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact