Ingo Paarmann

1.2k citations
16 papers · 997 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Ingo Paarmann

16 papers receiving 991 citations

Peers

Ingo Paarmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 661
  • Cell Biology 221
  • Developmental Neuroscience 52
  • Molecular Biology 685
  • Neurology 78
Replace Richard S. Saliba with:
Richard S. Saliba United Kingdom
Emily S. Gibson United States
Björn Granseth Sweden
Annarita Patrizi Germany
Kazunori Kanemaru Japan
Anna Karpova Germany
Alicia M. Ruggiero United States
Tabrez J. Siddiqui Canada
Tolga Soykan Germany
Insuk Song United States
Ingo Paarmann relative to Richard S. Saliba United Kingdom Richard S. Saliba's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Richard S. Saliba · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ingo Paarmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingo Paarmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingo Paarmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingo Paarmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingo Paarmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingo Paarmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingo Paarmann. The network helps show where Ingo Paarmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ingo Paarmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ingo Paarmann Line = papers co-authored together Ingo Paarmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2009391
2 2004134
3 200665
4
In vitro and in vivo characterization of conantokin-R, a selective NMDA receptor antagonist isolated from the venom of the fish-hunting snail Conus radiatus.
200063
5 200053
6 201243
7 200042
8 200233
9 200632
10 200730
11 201126
12 200224
13 201422
14 200519
15 200813
16 20067

About Ingo Paarmann

Ingo Paarmann is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cell Biology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Materials Chemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 997 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (10 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (6 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (4 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (2 papers), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (2 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (2 papers) and Protein Structure and Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (661 citations), Cell Biology (221 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (52 citations), Molecular Biology (685 citations) and Neurology (78 citations). Ingo Paarmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Heinrich Betz, Bertram Schmitt, Michael Hollmann, Guido R.Y. De Meyer, Theofilos Papadopoulos, Céline Fuchs, Peter Jedlička, Stephan W. Schwarzacher, Weiqi Zhang and Alexandros Poulopoulos. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Neurochemistry, The EMBO Journal, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and The Journal of Comparative Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact