Ingo Kober

634 total citations
11 papers, 519 citations indexed

About

Ingo Kober is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Ingo Kober has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 519 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Genetics and 2 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Ingo Kober's work include RNA Research and Splicing (6 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (5 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (5 papers). Ingo Kober is often cited by papers focused on RNA Research and Splicing (6 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (5 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (5 papers). Ingo Kober collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Italy. Ingo Kober's co-authors include Klaus H. Seifart, M. Albers, Manfred Koegl, Walter Stünkel, Carmen Kaiser, Harald Kranz, Claus Kremoser, Ulrich Deuschle, Rainer Kern and Jörg Bungert and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nucleic Acids Research and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Ingo Kober

11 papers receiving 500 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ingo Kober Germany 8 366 148 133 89 40 11 519
Cheng-Ming Chiang United States 8 381 1.0× 133 0.9× 81 0.6× 63 0.7× 66 1.6× 9 639
Yasutoshi Uchiyama Japan 9 209 0.6× 63 0.4× 89 0.7× 50 0.6× 38 0.9× 9 319
Laurent Naudin France 8 358 1.0× 230 1.6× 248 1.9× 105 1.2× 46 1.1× 8 556
Wei Ping Li United States 6 256 0.7× 70 0.5× 227 1.7× 45 0.5× 53 1.3× 8 492
Annegret Nath Germany 15 387 1.1× 52 0.4× 106 0.8× 61 0.7× 39 1.0× 19 591
Georgina B. Harrison United Kingdom 8 256 0.7× 101 0.7× 112 0.8× 37 0.4× 63 1.6× 9 517
Stuart W. Bright United States 5 369 1.0× 87 0.6× 55 0.4× 70 0.8× 13 0.3× 8 516
Jeffrey A. Moshier United States 13 468 1.3× 69 0.5× 84 0.6× 60 0.7× 35 0.9× 33 641
Guimin Guan United States 7 316 0.9× 89 0.6× 239 1.8× 46 0.5× 154 3.9× 8 555
Fiona Herr United States 10 349 1.0× 84 0.6× 40 0.3× 40 0.4× 19 0.5× 27 489

Countries citing papers authored by Ingo Kober

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingo Kober's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingo Kober with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingo Kober more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingo Kober

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingo Kober. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingo Kober. The network helps show where Ingo Kober may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ingo Kober

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ingo Kober. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ingo Kober based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ingo Kober. Ingo Kober is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Busch, Michael, et al.. (2013). Does Your Lab Coat Fit to Your Assay?. SLAS DISCOVERY. 18(6). 744–747. 3 indexed citations
2.
Albers, M., Beatrix Blume, Matthew B. Wright, et al.. (2005). A Novel Principle for Partial Agonism of Liver X Receptor Ligands. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 281(8). 4920–4930. 78 indexed citations
3.
Albers, M., Harald Kranz, Ingo Kober, et al.. (2004). Automated Yeast Two-hybrid Screening for Nuclear Receptor-interacting Proteins. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 4(2). 205–213. 102 indexed citations
4.
Otte, Kerstin, Harald Kranz, Ingo Kober, et al.. (2003). Identification of Farnesoid X Receptor β as a Novel Mammalian Nuclear Receptor Sensing Lanosterol. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 23(3). 864–872. 142 indexed citations
5.
Kober, Ingo, Charles Girardot, Eva Loeser, et al.. (2002). Elucidation of an Archaeal Replication Protein Network to Generate Enhanced PCR Enzymes. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 277(18). 16179–16188. 40 indexed citations
6.
Kober, Ingo, Martin Teichmann, & Klaus H. Seifart. (1998). hTFIIIB-β stably binds to pol II promoters and recruits RNA polymerase III in a hTFIIIC1 dependent way 1 1Edited by M. Yaniv. Journal of Molecular Biology. 284(1). 7–20. 6 indexed citations
7.
Stünkel, Walter, Ingo Kober, & Klaus H. Seifart. (1997). A Nucleosome Positioned in the Distal Promoter Region Activates Transcription of the Human U6 Gene. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 17(8). 4397–4405. 66 indexed citations
8.
Härtel, Frauke V., et al.. (1997). Human transcription factors IIIC2, IIIC1 and a novel component IIIC0 fulfil different aspects of DNA binding to various pol III genes. Nucleic Acids Research. 25(12). 2440–2447. 25 indexed citations
9.
Stünkel, Walter, et al.. (1995). Human TFIIIA alone is sufficient to prevent nucleosomal repression of a homologous 5S gene. Nucleic Acids Research. 23(1). 109–116. 10 indexed citations
11.
Bungert, Jörg, Rainer Waldschmidt, Ingo Kober, & Klaus H. Seifart. (1992). Transcription factor IIA is inactivated during terminal differentiation of avian erythroid cells.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 89(24). 11678–11682. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026