Ingo Barth

2.1k total citations
41 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Ingo Barth is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Ingo Barth has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 10 papers in Spectroscopy and 3 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in Ingo Barth's work include Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (36 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (24 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (19 papers). Ingo Barth is often cited by papers focused on Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (36 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (24 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (19 papers). Ingo Barth collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and China. Ingo Barth's co-authors include J. Manz, Olga Smirnova, Kunlong Liu, Kiyoshi Yagi, Yasuteru Shigeta, Manfred Lein, Luis Serrano‐Andrés, Anatole Kenfack, G. K. Paramonov and Hans‐Christian Hege and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Physical Review Letters and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.

In The Last Decade

Ingo Barth

41 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ingo Barth Germany 22 1.7k 439 213 142 83 41 1.7k
Denitsa Baykusheva Switzerland 20 1.9k 1.1× 702 1.6× 207 1.0× 158 1.1× 86 1.0× 32 2.0k
David Ayuso Italy 17 1.3k 0.8× 533 1.2× 129 0.6× 136 1.0× 72 0.9× 35 1.4k
Dmitry A. Telnov Russia 22 1.8k 1.1× 535 1.2× 272 1.3× 139 1.0× 35 0.4× 81 1.9k
Luca Argenti Spain 24 1.8k 1.1× 752 1.7× 79 0.4× 115 0.8× 80 1.0× 78 1.8k
Jan Marcus Dahlström Sweden 23 2.5k 1.5× 1.1k 2.4× 237 1.1× 166 1.2× 52 0.6× 59 2.5k
Stefan Nagele Austria 20 1.7k 1.0× 647 1.5× 213 1.0× 142 1.0× 28 0.3× 36 1.7k
Romain Géneaux France 14 1.1k 0.7× 329 0.7× 227 1.1× 119 0.8× 29 0.3× 22 1.2k
Stefan Pabst Germany 17 1.3k 0.8× 424 1.0× 165 0.8× 197 1.4× 34 0.4× 30 1.4k
Renate Pazourek Austria 14 1.3k 0.8× 532 1.2× 153 0.7× 126 0.9× 27 0.3× 25 1.4k
Jonathan G. Underwood United Kingdom 18 1.3k 0.8× 592 1.3× 94 0.4× 74 0.5× 116 1.4× 40 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Ingo Barth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingo Barth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingo Barth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingo Barth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingo Barth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingo Barth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingo Barth. The network helps show where Ingo Barth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ingo Barth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ingo Barth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ingo Barth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ingo Barth. Ingo Barth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Liu, Kunlong, et al.. (2022). How to approximate the Dirac equation with the Mauser method. Quantum Studies Mathematics and Foundations. 9(3). 287–332. 1 indexed citations
2.
Liu, Kunlong, Siqiang Luo, Min Li, et al.. (2019). Detecting and Characterizing the Nonadiabaticity of Laser-Induced Quantum Tunneling. Physical Review Letters. 122(5). 53202–53202. 49 indexed citations
3.
Liu, Kunlong, et al.. (2018). Deformation of Atomic p± Orbitals in Strong Elliptically Polarized Laser Fields: Ionization Time Drifts and Spatial Photoelectron Separation. Physical Review Letters. 121(20). 203201–203201. 39 indexed citations
4.
Eckart, S., M. Kunitski, Martin Richter, et al.. (2018). Ultrafast preparation and detection of ring currents in single atoms. Nature Physics. 14(7). 701–704. 106 indexed citations
5.
Barth, Ingo. (2018). Probability and Flux Densities in the Center-of-Mass Frame. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 122(8). 2144–2149. 3 indexed citations
6.
Liu, Kunlong & Ingo Barth. (2017). Identifying the Tunneling Site in Strong-Field Ionization of H2+. Physical Review Letters. 119(24). 243204–243204. 18 indexed citations
7.
Liu, Kunlong, et al.. (2017). Producing spin-polarized photoelectrons by using the momentum gate in strong-field ionization experiments. Physical review. A. 95(6). 26 indexed citations
8.
Barth, Ingo, et al.. (2017). Ultrafast optically induced resonant and non-resonant current generation in atoms and nanostructures: role of the photons orbital angular momentum. Journal of Modern Optics. 64(10-11). 1088–1095. 7 indexed citations
9.
Zhu, Xiaosong, Pengfei Lan, Kunlong Liu, et al.. (2016). Helicity sensitive enhancement of strong-field ionization in circularly polarized laser fields. Optics Express. 24(4). 4196–4196. 42 indexed citations
10.
Barth, Ingo & Olga Smirnova. (2013). Nonadiabatic tunneling in circularly polarized laser fields. II. Derivation of formulas. Physical Review A. 87(1). 86 indexed citations
11.
Barth, Ingo & Olga Smirnova. (2013). Spin-polarized electrons produced by strong-field ionization. Physical Review A. 88(1). 93 indexed citations
12.
Barth, Ingo & Olga Smirnova. (2013). Comparison of theory and experiment for nonadiabatic tunneling in circularly polarized fields. Physical Review A. 87(6). 22 indexed citations
13.
Barth, Ingo, Christian Bressler, Shiro Koseki, & J. Manz. (2012). Strong Nuclear Ring Currents and Magnetic Fields in Pseudorotating OsH4 Molecules Induced by Circularly Polarized Laser Pulses. Chemistry - An Asian Journal. 7(6). 1261–1295. 17 indexed citations
14.
Barth, Ingo. (2012). Translational Effects on Electronic and Nuclear Ring Currents. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 116(46). 11283–11303. 4 indexed citations
15.
Barth, Ingo, et al.. (2010). From Synchronous to Sequential Double Proton Transfer: Quantum Dynamics Simulations for the Model Porphine. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 114(42). 11252–11262. 21 indexed citations
16.
Kenfack, Anatole, et al.. (2010). Molecular isotopic effects on coupled electronic and nuclear fluxes. Physical Review A. 82(6). 15 indexed citations
17.
Xie, Xinhua, Armin Scrinzi, M. Wickenhauser, et al.. (2008). Internal Momentum State Mapping Using High Harmonic Radiation. Physical Review Letters. 101(3). 33901–33901. 76 indexed citations
18.
Barth, Ingo, J. Manz, & Luis Serrano‐Andrés. (2007). Quantum simulations of toroidal electric ring currents and magnetic fields in linear molecules induced by circularly polarized laser pulses. Chemical Physics. 347(1-3). 263–271. 36 indexed citations
19.
Barth, Ingo & J. Manz. (2006). Periodic Electron Circulation Induced by Circularly Polarized Laser Pulses: Quantum Model Simulations for Mg Porphyrin. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 45(18). 2962–2965. 150 indexed citations
20.
Barth, Ingo, J. Manz, Yasuteru Shigeta, & Kiyoshi Yagi. (2006). Unidirectional Electronic Ring Current Driven by a Few Cycle Circularly Polarized Laser Pulse:  Quantum Model Simulations for Mg−Porphyrin. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 128(21). 7043–7049. 221 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Denitsa Baykusheva Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David Ayuso Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dmitry A. Telnov Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Luca Argenti Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jan Marcus Dahlström Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stefan Nagele Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Romain Géneaux Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stefan Pabst Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Renate Pazourek Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jonathan G. Underwood
Rankless by CCL
2026