Ing‐Marie Claesson

505 total citations
27 papers, 375 citations indexed

About

Ing‐Marie Claesson is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Ing‐Marie Claesson has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 375 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 9 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Ing‐Marie Claesson's work include Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (14 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (7 papers) and Birth, Development, and Health (6 papers). Ing‐Marie Claesson is often cited by papers focused on Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (14 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (7 papers) and Birth, Development, and Health (6 papers). Ing‐Marie Claesson collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, United States and China. Ing‐Marie Claesson's co-authors include Ann Josefsson, Gunilla Sydsjö, Gunilla Sydsjö, J Säve-Söderbergh, Jan Brynhildsen, Adam Sydsjö, Marie Blomberg, A. Jeppsson, Marie I. Cedergren and Lotta Larsson and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Public Health, Archives of Disease in Childhood and Acta Paediatrica.

In The Last Decade

Ing‐Marie Claesson

26 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ing‐Marie Claesson Sweden 11 176 170 82 80 66 27 375
İlknur İnegöl Gümüş Türkiye 12 176 1.0× 138 0.8× 68 0.8× 152 1.9× 72 1.1× 50 523
Sine Knorr Denmark 11 353 2.0× 79 0.5× 102 1.2× 234 2.9× 45 0.7× 33 534
Justine Gross Switzerland 12 328 1.9× 119 0.7× 135 1.6× 108 1.4× 52 0.8× 23 483
M. A. Q. Mutsaerts Netherlands 10 145 0.8× 187 1.1× 42 0.5× 211 2.6× 30 0.5× 15 469
Baizhuang Xu Finland 11 99 0.6× 119 0.7× 25 0.3× 217 2.7× 71 1.1× 13 518
Lesley Plumptre Canada 11 145 0.8× 132 0.8× 16 0.2× 184 2.3× 39 0.6× 31 460
Mary Ashley Cain United States 10 257 1.5× 218 1.3× 95 1.2× 286 3.6× 61 0.9× 25 528
Haritha Sagili India 11 103 0.6× 112 0.7× 61 0.7× 92 1.1× 18 0.3× 71 350
Barthélémy Tosello France 12 82 0.5× 81 0.5× 72 0.9× 337 4.2× 44 0.7× 65 504
Karine Goueslard France 10 180 1.0× 53 0.3× 101 1.2× 86 1.1× 17 0.3× 26 351

Countries citing papers authored by Ing‐Marie Claesson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ing‐Marie Claesson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ing‐Marie Claesson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ing‐Marie Claesson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ing‐Marie Claesson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ing‐Marie Claesson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ing‐Marie Claesson. The network helps show where Ing‐Marie Claesson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ing‐Marie Claesson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ing‐Marie Claesson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ing‐Marie Claesson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ing‐Marie Claesson. Ing‐Marie Claesson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Forslund, Maria, et al.. (2023). Treatments for hyperemesis gravidarum: A systematic review. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 103(1). 13–29. 6 indexed citations
2.
Claesson, Ing‐Marie, et al.. (2020). The Association Between Covariates, with Emphasis on Maternal Body Mass Index, and Duration of Exclusive and Total Breastfeeding. Breastfeeding Medicine. 15(10). 622–629. 4 indexed citations
4.
Claesson, Ing‐Marie, et al.. (2018). “You just need to leave the room when you breastfeed” Breastfeeding experiences among obese women in Sweden – A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 18(1). 39–39. 21 indexed citations
5.
Claesson, Ing‐Marie, et al.. (2018). Effects of a gestational weight gain restriction program for obese women: Sibling pairs’ weight development during the first five years of life. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. 17. 65–74. 8 indexed citations
6.
Claesson, Ing‐Marie, et al.. (2017). ‘I just want to be normal’ – A qualitative study of pregnant women's blogs who present themselves as overweight or obese. Midwifery. 49. 65–71. 16 indexed citations
7.
8.
Bladh, Marie, Jan Brynhildsen, Ing‐Marie Claesson, et al.. (2016). Maternal obesity (Class I-III), gestational weight gain and maternal leptin levels during and after pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. BMC Obesity. 3(1). 28–28. 16 indexed citations
9.
Claesson, Ing‐Marie, et al.. (2014). Lifestyle habits and women's attitudes towards discussing them at a visit for contraceptive advice. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. 6(3). 114–118. 2 indexed citations
10.
Claesson, Ing‐Marie, Ann Josefsson, & Gunilla Sydsjö. (2013). Weight six years after childbirth: A follow-up of obese women in a weight-gain restriction programmme. Midwifery. 30(5). 506–511. 7 indexed citations
11.
Claesson, Ing‐Marie, et al.. (2013). Physical activity and psychological well-being in obese pregnant and postpartum women attending a weight-gain restriction programme. Midwifery. 30(1). 11–16. 54 indexed citations
12.
Sydsjö, Gunilla, et al.. (2013). Effects of a weight-gain restriction programme for obese pregnant women on sickness absence and pregnancy benefits. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 31(2). 106–110. 4 indexed citations
13.
Josefsson, Ann, et al.. (2011). Total cost comparison of standard antenatal care with a weight gain restriction programme for obese pregnant women. Public Health. 125(5). 311–317. 6 indexed citations
14.
Claesson, Ing‐Marie, Jan Brynhildsen, Marie I. Cedergren, et al.. (2011). Weight Gain Restriction During Pregnancy Is Safe for Both the Mother and Neonate. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest. 31(1). 48–48.
15.
Claesson, Ing‐Marie, Gunilla Sydsjö, Jan Brynhildsen, et al.. (2010). Weight after childbirth: a 2‐year follow‐up of obese women in a weight‐gain restriction program. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 90(1). 103–110. 18 indexed citations
16.
Claesson, Ing‐Marie, Ann Josefsson, & Gunilla Sydsjö. (2010). Prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms among obese pregnant and postpartum women: an intervention study. BMC Public Health. 10(1). 766–766. 43 indexed citations
17.
Claesson, Ing‐Marie, Jan Brynhildsen, Marie I. Cedergren, et al.. (2009). Weight gain restriction during pregnancy is safe for both the mother and neonate. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 88(10). 1158–1162. 13 indexed citations
18.
Sydsjö, Adam, Ing‐Marie Claesson, Katarina Ekholm Selling, et al.. (2007). Influence of obesity on the use of sickness absence and social benefits among pregnant working women. Public Health. 121(9). 656–662. 10 indexed citations
19.
Claesson, Ing‐Marie, Ann Josefsson, Marie I. Cedergren, et al.. (2007). Consumer satisfaction with a weight-gain intervention programme for obese pregnant women. Midwifery. 24(2). 163–167. 29 indexed citations
20.
Taranger, J, et al.. (1976). Skeletal development from birth to 7 years. Acta Paediatrica. 65(S258). 98–108. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026