Ingmar Bitter

1.4k total citations
29 papers, 773 citations indexed

About

Ingmar Bitter is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Oncology and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design. According to data from OpenAlex, Ingmar Bitter has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 773 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 11 papers in Oncology and 8 papers in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design. Recurrent topics in Ingmar Bitter's work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (11 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (10 papers) and Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (10 papers). Ingmar Bitter is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (11 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (10 papers) and Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (10 papers). Ingmar Bitter collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Ingmar Bitter's co-authors include Arie Kaufman, Mie Sato, Robert Van Uitert, Ming Wan, Michael A. Bender, Zhengrong Liang, Lichan Hong, Frank Dachille, M. Nakajima and Baoquan Chen and has published in prestigious journals such as Communications of the ACM, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging and Medical Physics.

In The Last Decade

Ingmar Bitter

28 papers receiving 724 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ingmar Bitter United States 14 478 214 151 143 110 29 773
M. Sabry Hassouna United States 10 320 0.7× 84 0.4× 97 0.6× 133 0.9× 27 0.2× 23 649
Daniel Fritsch United States 13 674 1.4× 111 0.5× 165 1.1× 201 1.4× 14 0.1× 37 1.0k
Kálmán Palágyi Hungary 14 564 1.2× 141 0.7× 122 0.8× 222 1.6× 17 0.2× 41 1.1k
J. Toriwaki Japan 10 320 0.7× 76 0.4× 74 0.5× 103 0.7× 21 0.2× 46 550
R. Wegenkittl Austria 17 463 1.0× 328 1.5× 207 1.4× 82 0.6× 16 0.1× 36 727
Dimitri Metaxas United States 15 667 1.4× 561 2.6× 586 3.9× 158 1.1× 41 0.4× 27 1.4k
Huisi Wu China 20 860 1.8× 72 0.3× 84 0.6× 497 3.5× 290 2.6× 76 1.6k
Chaoyi Zhang Australia 16 249 0.5× 67 0.3× 186 1.2× 208 1.5× 22 0.2× 57 787
Dewey Odhner United States 20 768 1.6× 190 0.9× 123 0.8× 497 3.5× 22 0.2× 86 1.5k
Charl P. Botha Netherlands 14 370 0.8× 184 0.9× 100 0.7× 135 0.9× 26 0.2× 62 715

Countries citing papers authored by Ingmar Bitter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingmar Bitter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingmar Bitter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingmar Bitter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingmar Bitter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingmar Bitter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingmar Bitter. The network helps show where Ingmar Bitter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ingmar Bitter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ingmar Bitter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ingmar Bitter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ingmar Bitter. Ingmar Bitter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Uitert, Robert Van & Ingmar Bitter. (2007). Subvoxel precise skeletons of volumetric data based on fast marching methods. Medical Physics. 34(2). 627–638. 88 indexed citations
2.
Bitter, Ingmar, Robert Van Uitert, Ivo Wolf, Luis Ibáñez, & Jan‐Martin Kuhnigk. (2007). Comparison of Four Freely Available Frameworks for Image Processing and Visualization That Use ITK. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 13(3). 483–493. 51 indexed citations
3.
Summers, Ronald M., Adam Huang, Jianhua Yao, et al.. (2006). Assessment of Polyp and Mass Histopathology by Intravenous Contrast–Enhanced CT Colonography. Academic Radiology. 13(12). 1490–1495. 7 indexed citations
4.
Uitert, Robert Van, Ingmar Bitter, & Ronald M. Summers. (2006). Detection of Colon Wall Outer Boundary and Segmentation of the Colon Wall Based on Level Set Methods. PubMed. 18. 3017–3020. 9 indexed citations
5.
Bitter, Ingmar, Robert Van Uitert, Ivo Wolf, et al.. (2006). Virtual Contrast for Coronary Vessels Based on Level Set Generated Subvoxel Accurate Centerlines. International Journal of Biomedical Imaging. 2006(1). 94025–94025. 5 indexed citations
6.
Li, Jiang, Adam Huang, Jianhua Yao, et al.. (2006). Automatic colonic polyp detection using multiobjective evolutionary techniques. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6144. 61445E–61445E. 8 indexed citations
7.
Uitert, Robert Van, Ingmar Bitter, & John A. Butman. (2006). Semi-automatic segmentation and quantification of 3D spinal cord data. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6143. 61430S–61430S. 2 indexed citations
8.
Uitert, Robert Van, Ingmar Bitter, & John A. Butman. (2005). Semi-automatic spinal cord segmentation and quantification. International Congress Series. 1281. 224–229. 20 indexed citations
9.
Kaufman, Arie, et al.. (2005). Virtual colonoscopy. Communications of the ACM. 48(2). 37–41. 23 indexed citations
10.
Bitter, Ingmar, et al.. (2005). Candidate determination for computer aided detection of colon polyps. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5746. 804–804. 1 indexed citations
11.
Wan, Ming, et al.. (2002). Automatic centerline extraction for virtual colonoscopy. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 21(12). 1450–1460. 92 indexed citations
12.
Sato, Mie, Ingmar Bitter, Michael A. Bender, Arie Kaufman, & M. Nakajima. (2002). TEASAR: tree-structure extraction algorithm for accurate and robust skeletons. 281–449. 71 indexed citations
13.
Li, Lihong, Dongqing Chen, Sarang Lakare, et al.. (2002). Image segmentation approach to extract colon lumen through colonic material tagging and hidden Markov random field model for virtual colonoscopy. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 4683. 406–406. 29 indexed citations
14.
Bitter, Ingmar, Arie Kaufman, & Mie Sato. (2001). Penalized-distance volumetric skeleton algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 7(3). 195–206. 175 indexed citations
15.
Bitter, Ingmar, Arie Kaufman, & Mark R. Wax. (2001). Fully automatic extraction of the colon centerline and its impact on a virtual colonoscopy system. International Congress Series. 1230. 665–668. 1 indexed citations
16.
Bitter, Ingmar, Mie Sato, Michael A. Bender, et al.. (2000). CEASAR: Accurate and Robust Algorithm for Extracting a Smooth Centerline. IEEE Visualization. 1 indexed citations
17.
Bitter, Ingmar, Mie Sato, Michael A. Bender, et al.. (2000). CEASAR: a smooth, accurate and robust centerline extraction algorithm. IEEE Visualization. 45–52. 37 indexed citations
18.
Wan, Ming, Wei Li, Ingmar Bitter, et al.. (2000). <title>3D virtual colonoscopy with real-time volume rendering</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 3978. 165–171. 21 indexed citations
19.
Bitter, Ingmar, et al.. (1998). Adaptive perspective ray casting. 55–62. 17 indexed citations
20.
Bitter, Ingmar & Arie Kaufman. (1997). A ray-slice-sweep volume rendering engine. 121–130. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026