Ingela Lindh

757 total citations
21 papers, 527 citations indexed

About

Ingela Lindh is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ingela Lindh has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 527 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 8 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 8 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in Ingela Lindh's work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (19 papers), Menstrual Health and Disorders (6 papers) and Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (6 papers). Ingela Lindh is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Health and Contraception (19 papers), Menstrual Health and Disorders (6 papers) and Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (6 papers). Ingela Lindh collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Denmark and Finland. Ingela Lindh's co-authors include Ian Milsom, Kristina Gemzell‐Danielsson, Øjvind Lidegaard, Finn Egil Skjeldestad, Oskari Heikinheimo, Cecilia Lundin, Lena Marions, Inger Sundström Poromaa, Marie Bixo and Jan Brynhildsen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology and Human Reproduction.

In The Last Decade

Ingela Lindh

21 papers receiving 505 citations

Peers

Ingela Lindh
Alicia M. Weissman United States
Anne Mariella United States
Madeleine A. Becker United States
Lenore Ellett Australia
Albert Franco United States
Alicia M. Weissman United States
Ingela Lindh
Citations per year, relative to Ingela Lindh Ingela Lindh (= 1×) peers Alicia M. Weissman

Countries citing papers authored by Ingela Lindh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingela Lindh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingela Lindh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingela Lindh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingela Lindh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingela Lindh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingela Lindh. The network helps show where Ingela Lindh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ingela Lindh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ingela Lindh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ingela Lindh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ingela Lindh. Ingela Lindh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gemzell‐Danielsson, Kristina, et al.. (2024). Home use of mifepristone for medical abortion: a systematic review. BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health. 51(3). 221–231. 1 indexed citations
2.
Kallner, Helena Kopp, Ingela Lindh, & Kristina Gemzell‐Danielsson. (2024). Non‐daily contraception: Reinforcing the choice of users and addressing unmet needs of reproductive health. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 104(2). 253–257. 1 indexed citations
3.
Milsom, Ian, et al.. (2024). The value of an extended postnatal program for contraceptive use during the first year postpartum. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 1 indexed citations
4.
Mårild, Staffan, et al.. (2023). Impact of BMI and smoking in adolescence and at the start of pregnancy on birth weight. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 23(1). 206–206. 1 indexed citations
5.
Bygdell, Maria, Staffan Mårild, Ingela Lindh, et al.. (2023). Birth Weight, Childhood and Young Adult Overweight, and the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Men. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology. 44(1). 314–321. 2 indexed citations
6.
Lindh, Ingela, Finn Egil Skjeldestad, Oskari Heikinheimo, et al.. (2022). Reproductive changes among women in their 40s: A cross‐sectional study. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 101(2). 248–255. 3 indexed citations
7.
Lindh, Ingela, et al.. (2020). New types of diaphragms and cervical caps versus older types of diaphragms and different gels for contraception: a systematic review. BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health. 47(3). e12–e12. 5 indexed citations
8.
Lundin, Cecilia, Kristina Gemzell‐Danielsson, Marie Bixo, et al.. (2018). Sexual function and combined oral contraceptives: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Endocrine Connections. 7(11). 1208–1216. 15 indexed citations
9.
Lundin, Cecilia, Kristina Gemzell‐Danielsson, Marie Bixo, et al.. (2018). Ongoing or previous mental disorders predispose to adverse mood reporting during combined oral contraceptive use. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 23(1). 45–51. 54 indexed citations
10.
Skjeldestad, Finn Egil, Kristina Gemzell‐Danielsson, Oskari Heikinheimo, et al.. (2018). Ecological study on the use of hormonal contraception, abortions and births among teenagers in the Nordic countries. BMJ Open. 8(10). e022473–e022473. 16 indexed citations
11.
Skjeldestad, Finn Egil, Kristina Gemzell‐Danielsson, Oskari Heikinheimo, et al.. (2017). High birth rates despite easy access to contraception and abortion: a cross‐sectional study. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 96(12). 1414–1422. 14 indexed citations
12.
Lindh, Ingela, Finn Egil Skjeldestad, Kristina Gemzell‐Danielsson, et al.. (2016). Contraceptive use in the Nordic countries. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 96(1). 19–28. 92 indexed citations
13.
Lundin, Cecilia, Kristina Gemzell‐Danielsson, Marie Bixo, et al.. (2016). Combined oral contraceptive use is associated with both improvement and worsening of mood in the different phases of the treatment cycle—A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 76. 135–143. 113 indexed citations
14.
Kallner, Helena Kopp, Sharon Cameron, Rebecca Heller, et al.. (2016). Immediate versus delayed insertion of an etonogestrel releasing implant at medical abortion—a randomized controlled equivalence trial. Human Reproduction. 31(11). 2484–2490. 31 indexed citations
15.
Lindh, Ingela, et al.. (2016). The changing pattern of contraceptive use and pregnancies in four generations of young women. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 95(11). 1264–1272. 25 indexed citations
16.
Lindh, Ingela & Ian Milsom. (2013). The influence of intrauterine contraception on the prevalence and severity of dysmenorrhea: a longitudinal population study. Human Reproduction. 28(7). 1953–1960. 40 indexed citations
17.
Lindh, Ingela, et al.. (2012). The effect of combined oral contraceptives and age on dysmenorrhoea: an epidemiological study. Human Reproduction. 27(3). 676–682. 39 indexed citations
18.
Lindh, Ingela, et al.. (2011). The long-term influence of combined oral contraceptives on body weight. Human Reproduction. 26(7). 1917–1924. 23 indexed citations
19.
Lindh, Ingela, et al.. (2010). A longitudinal study of contraception and pregnancies in the same women followed for a quarter of a century. Human Reproduction. 25(6). 1415–1422. 14 indexed citations
20.
Lindh, Ingela, et al.. (2009). Contraceptive use and pregnancy outcome in three generations of Swedish female teenagers from the same urban population. Contraception. 80(2). 163–169. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026