Inge Theisen

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
11 papers, 970 citations indexed

About

Inge Theisen is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Inge Theisen has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 970 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 8 papers in Plant Science and 3 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Inge Theisen's work include Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (6 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (6 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (4 papers). Inge Theisen is often cited by papers focused on Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (6 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (6 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (4 papers). Inge Theisen collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Australia and United States. Inge Theisen's co-authors include Wilhelm Barthlott, Christoph Neinhuis, David Cutler, Stefan Porembski, Thomas Borsch, Laurent Legendre, Kai Müller, Eberhard Fischer, Kerstin Reifenrath and Jan Schnitzler and has published in prestigious journals such as Plant Biology, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society and The Bryologist.

In The Last Decade

Inge Theisen

11 papers receiving 914 citations

Hit Papers

Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes 1998 2026 2007 2016 1998 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Inge Theisen Germany 9 691 384 200 87 73 11 970
Claus Markstädter Germany 10 426 0.6× 283 0.7× 146 0.7× 36 0.4× 27 0.4× 12 740
Yannick M. Staedler Austria 19 418 0.6× 551 1.4× 371 1.9× 16 0.2× 37 0.5× 36 939
Eduardo Ruíz Chile 17 450 0.7× 638 1.7× 288 1.4× 7 0.1× 62 0.8× 116 1.1k
Winfried S. Peters United States 26 1.4k 2.0× 155 0.4× 572 2.9× 23 0.3× 74 1.0× 81 1.8k
Paula S. Williamson United States 15 172 0.2× 330 0.9× 190 0.9× 49 0.6× 27 0.4× 33 730
Michael Riedel Germany 11 336 0.5× 116 0.3× 82 0.4× 63 0.7× 10 0.1× 13 512
Tina Steinbrecher United Kingdom 17 686 1.0× 129 0.3× 329 1.6× 29 0.3× 35 0.5× 33 941
Diana M. R. Harvey United Kingdom 15 643 0.9× 92 0.2× 273 1.4× 26 0.3× 40 0.5× 38 900
Masaya Ishikawa Japan 23 832 1.2× 126 0.3× 479 2.4× 7 0.1× 45 0.6× 64 1.1k
Hyeok Jae Choi South Korea 13 468 0.7× 317 0.8× 224 1.1× 20 0.2× 32 0.4× 99 723

Countries citing papers authored by Inge Theisen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inge Theisen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inge Theisen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inge Theisen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inge Theisen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inge Theisen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inge Theisen. The network helps show where Inge Theisen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inge Theisen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inge Theisen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inge Theisen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Inge Theisen. Inge Theisen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Fischer, Eberhard, Wolfgang Frey, & Inge Theisen. (2015). Syllabus of Plant Families - A. Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien Part 4:. 12 indexed citations
2.
Fischer, Eberhard, et al.. (2010). Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Kakamega Forest, Western Province, Kenya. Journal of the East Africa Natural History Society and National Museum. 99(2). 129–226. 36 indexed citations
3.
Barthlott, Wilhelm, et al.. (2007). The Curious World of Carnivorous Plants. elib (German Aerospace Center). 7 indexed citations
4.
Porembski, Stefan, Inge Theisen, & Wilhelm Barthlott. (2006). Biomass allocation patterns in terrestrial, epiphytic and aquatic species of Utricularia (Lentibulariaceae). Flora. 201(6). 477–482. 9 indexed citations
5.
Reifenrath, Kerstin, Inge Theisen, Jan Schnitzler, Stefan Porembski, & Wilhelm Barthlott. (2006). Trap architecture in carnivorous Utricularia (Lentibulariaceae). Flora. 201(8). 597–605. 38 indexed citations
6.
Hess, Sebastian, Jan‐Peter Frahm, & Inge Theisen. (2005). Evidence of Zoophagy in a Second Liverwort Species, Pleurozia purpurea. The Bryologist. 108(2). 212–218. 9 indexed citations
7.
Müller, Kai, Thomas Borsch, Laurent Legendre, et al.. (2004). Evolution of Carnivory in Lentibulariaceae and the Lamiales. Plant Biology. 6(4). 477–490. 109 indexed citations
8.
Markgraf, Vera, et al.. (2002). Physiographie, Vegetation und Syntaxonomie der Flora des Paramo de Papallacta (Ostkordillere Ecuador). Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research. 34(2). 231–231. 10 indexed citations
10.
Barthlott, Wilhelm, et al.. (1998). Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 126(3). 237–260. 723 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Theisen, Inge & Wilhelm Barthlott. (1996). Die Mikromorphologie epicuticularer Wachse bei den Caprifoliaceae. Feddes Repertorium. 107(1-2). 31–35. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026