Inge M.C.M. de Kok
- Epidemiology top 2%
- Oncology top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Microbiology top 5%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Marjolein van BallegooijenFolkert J. van KemenadeJoost van RosmalenMarc ArbynJ. Dik F. HabbemaSteffie K. NaberMatejka ReboljDik Habbema
- Topics
- Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (60 papers)Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (45 papers)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (21 papers)
- Cited by
- OncologyEpidemiologyMicrobiology
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Inge M.C.M. de Kok
76 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Epidemiology 1.1k
- Oncology 924
- Surgery 309
- Microbiology 161
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 161
Countries citing papers authored by Inge M.C.M. de Kok
This map shows the geographic impact of Inge M.C.M. de Kok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inge M.C.M. de Kok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inge M.C.M. de Kok more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Inge M.C.M. de Kok
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inge M.C.M. de Kok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inge M.C.M. de Kok. The network helps show where Inge M.C.M. de Kok may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inge M.C.M. de Kok
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inge M.C.M. de Kok. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inge M.C.M. de Kok based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Inge M.C.M. de Kok. Inge M.C.M. de Kok is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | Optimal cervical screening COVID-19 recovery strategies in high-income countries depend on context of current programme organisation | 1 |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 45 | |
| 20 | 41 |
About Inge M.C.M. de Kok
Inge M.C.M. de Kok is a scholar working on Oncology, Epidemiology and Microbiology, having authored 83 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (60 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (45 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (924 citations), Epidemiology (1.1k citations) and Microbiology (161 citations). Inge M.C.M. de Kok has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Marjolein van Ballegooijen, Folkert J. van Kemenade, Joost van Rosmalen, Marc Arbyn, J. Dik F. Habbema, Steffie K. Naber, Matejka Rebolj, Dik Habbema, Martin L. Brown and Albert G. Siebers. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, PLoS ONE and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.