Ines Stölting
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
- Physiology top 10%
- Diet and metabolism studies
- Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
Papers in
-
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 6
- Gut microbiota and health 3
-
- Renin-Angiotensin System Studies 6
- Co-authors
- Markus Schwaninger (6 shared papers)Mahtab Ahmad Khan (2 shared papers)Dirk A. Ridder (2 shared papers)Helge Müller‐Fielitz (2 shared papers)Hui Chen (1 shared paper)Jürgen G. Okun (1 shared paper)Roger Nadrowitz (1 shared paper)Tillman Vollbrandt (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology (2 papers)Nature Communications (2 papers)British Journal of Pharmacology (2 papers)Journal of Endocrinology (2 papers)Frontiers in Pharmacology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyBrazilUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ines Stölting
19 papers receiving 619 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Biological Psychiatry 35
- Physiology 289
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 55
- Neurology 63
- Clinical Biochemistry 42
Countries citing papers authored by Ines Stölting
This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Stölting's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Stölting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Stölting more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Stölting
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Stölting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Stölting. The network helps show where Ines Stölting may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ines Stölting, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 344 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 1 |
About Ines Stölting
Ines Stölting is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 19 papers that have together received 620 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers), Renin-Angiotensin System Studies (6 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (5 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (3 papers), Gut microbiota and health (3 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers) and Apelin-related biomedical research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (35 citations), Physiology (289 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (55 citations), Neurology (63 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (42 citations). Ines Stölting has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Markus Schwaninger, Mahtab Ahmad Khan, Dirk A. Ridder, Helge Müller‐Fielitz, Hui Chen, Jürgen G. Okun, Roger Nadrowitz, Tillman Vollbrandt, Stefan Offermanns and Mahbubur Rahman. Their work appears in journals such as Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, Nature Communications, British Journal of Pharmacology, Journal of Endocrinology and Frontiers in Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.