Inès Mottas

432 citations
10 papers · 360 · h-index 10

Impact in

    • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
    • Immune cells in cancer
    • Immune Response and Inflammation
    • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Biomaterials top 10%
    • Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

Papers in

    • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses 8
    • Immune Cell Function and Interaction 4
    • Immune Response and Inflammation 4
    • RNA Interference and Gene Delivery 3

Inès Mottas

10 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers

Inès Mottas
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Immunology 212
  • Biomaterials 100
  • Pharmaceutical Science 15
  • Biomedical Engineering 104
  • Oncology 64
Replace Nanhui Liu with:
Nanhui Liu China
Liwen Song China
Michelle K. Greene United Kingdom
Yina Wu South Korea
Tam Nguyen United States
Zongjin Yang China
Gregory P. Howard United States
Meilyn Sylvestre United States
Chanyoung Song South Korea
Chintan H. Kapadia United States
Inès Mottas relative to Nanhui Liu China Nanhui Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Nanhui Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inès Mottas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inès Mottas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inès Mottas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inès Mottas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inès Mottas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inès Mottas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inès Mottas. The network helps show where Inès Mottas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inès Mottas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inès Mottas Line = papers co-authored together Inès Mottas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201671
2 201751
3 201849
4 201847
5 201932
6 201930
7 201630
8 201625
9 201715
10 202110

About Inès Mottas

Inès Mottas is a scholar working on Immunology, Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry, Oncology and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 10 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (8 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (4 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (4 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (3 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (2 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (1 paper), Advanced Glycation End Products research (1 paper) and Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology (212 citations), Biomaterials (100 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (15 citations), Biomedical Engineering (104 citations) and Oncology (64 citations). Inès Mottas has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Carole Bourquin, Lorenzo Spagnuolo, C. Hotz, Thibaud Spinetti, Florence Delié, Éric Allémann, Chiara Secondini, Curzio Rüegg, Alke Petri‐Fink and Barbara Rothen‐Rutishauser. Their work appears in journals such as Biomaterials, OncoImmunology, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics and ACS Nano.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact