Ines Frederix
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 2%
- Rehabilitation top 1%
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 1%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Co-authors
- Paul DendaleDominique HansenMassimo PiepoliNiels Van DriesscheKaatje GoetschalckxLuc VanheesMartijn ScherrenbergKarin Coninx
- Topics
- Cardiac Health and Mental Health (30 papers)Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (12 papers)Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumSwitzerlandGermany
In The Last Decade
Ines Frederix
49 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.1k
- Rehabilitation 324
- Complementary and alternative medicine 309
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 261
- General Health Professions 216
Countries citing papers authored by Ines Frederix
This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Frederix's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Frederix with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Frederix more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Frederix
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Frederix. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Frederix. The network helps show where Ines Frederix may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ines Frederix
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ines Frederix. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ines Frederix based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ines Frederix. Ines Frederix is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 112 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 131 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | Do we keep cardiac patients out of hospital by adding telerehabilitation to standard rehabilitation? | 3 |
| 16 | 102 | |
| 17 | The influence of a web-based tele-rehabilitation program on the physical fitness of coronary artery disease patients after the acute rehabilitation phase. | 1 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Ines Frederix
Ines Frederix is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Rehabilitation and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Health and Mental Health (30 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (12 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (324 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.1k citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (309 citations). Ines Frederix has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Paul Dendale, Dominique Hansen, Massimo Piepoli, Niels Van Driessche, Kaatje Goetschalckx, Luc Vanhees, Martijn Scherrenberg, Karin Coninx, Heinz Völler and Niel Hens. Their work appears in journals such as European Heart Journal, International Journal of Obesity and Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.