Indrė Antanaitis-Jacobs
- Genetics top 10%
- Archeology top 1%
- Paleontology top 5%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- Shuichi MatsumuraPeter ForsterJennifer HillerFriedrich LuethWolfgang HaakKristiina TambetsMiriam Noël HaidleJoachim Bürger
- Topics
- Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (5 papers)Historical and Archaeological Studies (4 papers)Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (2 papers)
- Cited by
- PaleontologyArcheologyGenetics
- Journals
- Science
In The Last Decade
Indrė Antanaitis-Jacobs
7 papers receiving 342 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Genetics 231
- Archeology 185
- Paleontology 160
- Anthropology 68
- Ecology 35
Countries citing papers authored by Indrė Antanaitis-Jacobs
This map shows the geographic impact of Indrė Antanaitis-Jacobs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Indrė Antanaitis-Jacobs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Indrė Antanaitis-Jacobs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Indrė Antanaitis-Jacobs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Indrė Antanaitis-Jacobs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Indrė Antanaitis-Jacobs. The network helps show where Indrė Antanaitis-Jacobs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Indrė Antanaitis-Jacobs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Indrė Antanaitis-Jacobs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Indrė Antanaitis-Jacobs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Indrė Antanaitis-Jacobs. Indrė Antanaitis-Jacobs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 319 | |
| 2 | When did Domesticated Horses appear in Lithuania | 2 |
| 3 | Archeobotanika Lietuvoje : makrobotaniniai ir palinologiniai tyrinėjimai | 1 |
| 4 | Akmens ir bronzos amžiaus gyventojų poveikis aplinkai ir jų ūkinė veikla Rytų Baltijos regione archeobotaninių tyrimų duomenimis | 2 |
| 5 | Periodization and chronology of the Neolithic in Lithuania | 18 |
| 6 | The Evolution of the subsistence economy and archaeobotanical research in Lithuania | 4 |
| 7 | Chemical analysis of bone: stable isotope evidence of the diet of Neolithic and Bronze Age people in Lithuania | 17 |
About Indrė Antanaitis-Jacobs
Indrė Antanaitis-Jacobs is a scholar working on Archeology, History and Paleontology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (5 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (4 papers) and Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (160 citations), Archeology (185 citations) and Genetics (231 citations). Indrė Antanaitis-Jacobs has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Estonia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Shuichi Matsumura, Peter Forster, Jennifer Hiller, Friedrich Lueth, Wolfgang Haak, Kristiina Tambets, Miriam Noël Haidle, Joachim Bürger, Rimantas Jankauskas and Thomas Terberger. Their work appears in journals such as Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.