Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial
20101.3k citationsIlfet Songun, Hein Putter et al.The Lancet Oncologyprofile →
Extended Lymph-Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer
19991.2k citationsJohannes J. Bonenkamp, J. Hermans et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients
1995809 citationsJohannes J. Bonenkamp, Ilfet Songun et al.The Lancetprofile →
Extended Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer: Who May Benefit? Final Results of the Randomized Dutch Gastric Cancer Group Trial
2004671 citationsH.H. Hartgrink, C.J.H. van de Velde et al.Journal of Clinical Oncologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ilfet Songun's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ilfet Songun with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ilfet Songun more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ilfet Songun. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ilfet Songun. The network helps show where Ilfet Songun may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ilfet Songun
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ilfet Songun.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ilfet Songun based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ilfet Songun. Ilfet Songun is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Songun, Ilfet, Hein Putter, Elma Meershoek‐Klein Kranenbarg, Mitsuru Sasako, & Cornelis JH van de Velde. (2010). Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 11(5). 439–449.1285 indexed citations breakdown →
Castro, S. M. M. de, Ilfet Songun, & Boudewijn J. Dwars. (2009). An unexpected severe complication after a negative laparoscopic appendectomy.. PubMed. 52(6). E295–6.4 indexed citations
Hartgrink, H.H., C.J.H. van de Velde, Hein Putter, et al.. (2004). Extended Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer: Who May Benefit? Final Results of the Randomized Dutch Gastric Cancer Group Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 22(11). 2069–2077.671 indexed citations breakdown →
Bonenkamp, Johannes J., J. Hermans, Mitsuru Sasako, et al.. (1999). Extended Lymph-Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 340(12). 908–914.1178 indexed citations breakdown →
Bonenkamp, Johannes J., Ilfet Songun, K Welvaart, et al.. (1995). Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients. The Lancet. 345(8952). 745–748.809 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.