Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Advancements of wave energy converters based on power take off (PTO) systems: A review
2020227 citationsRaju Ahamed, Kristoffer McKee et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Howard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Howard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Howard more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Howard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Howard. The network helps show where Ian Howard may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian Howard
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian Howard.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian Howard based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ian Howard. Ian Howard is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mazhar, Ilyas, et al.. (2016). An Investigation Into Bearing Fault Diagnostics for Condition Based Maintenance Using Band - Pass Filtering and Wavelet Decomposition Analysis of Vibration Signals. eSpace (Curtin University). 2049–2060.2 indexed citations
11.
Nohooji, Hamed Rahimi, Ian Howard, & Lei Cui. (2016). Neural adaptive assist-as-needed control for rehabilitation robots. eSpace (Curtin University). 74–80.6 indexed citations
12.
Reda, Ahmed, et al.. (2014). Vibration of a curved subsea pipeline due to internal slug flow. Cancer. 82(1). 86–95.7 indexed citations
13.
McKee, Kristoffer, et al.. (2012). Modification of the ISO-10816 centrifugal pump vibration severity charts for use with Octave band spectral measurements. eSpace (Curtin University). 276–283.2 indexed citations
14.
Mazhar, Ilyas, et al.. (2012). A FRAMEWORK FOR THE ADOPTION OF RAPID PROTOTYPING FOR SMEs: FROM STRATEGIC TO OPERATIONAL. International journal of industrial engineering. 19(3).1 indexed citations
Mazhar, Ilyas, et al.. (2011). A Systems Approach for the Effective Adoption of Rapid Prototyping for SMEs. eSpace (Curtin University).1 indexed citations
17.
Mazhar, Ilyas, et al.. (2011). Condition Based Maintenance (CBM) in the Oil and Gas Industry: An Overview of Methods and Techniques. eSpace (Curtin University).21 indexed citations
18.
Howard, Ian, et al.. (2007). A Common Formula for the Combined Torsional Mesh Stiffness of Spur Gears. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 1. 710–716.11 indexed citations
19.
Howard, Ian, et al.. (1996). A Review of Orbit Analysis for Turbogenerator Condition Monitoring. 719.2 indexed citations
20.
Howard, Ian. (1991). An Investigation of Vibration Signal Averaging of Individual Components in an Epicyclic Gearbox. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.