Ian Cathers

33 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Ian Cathers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 149
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 74
  • Pharmacology 245
  • Neurology 103
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 235
Replace Phillip F. Gardiner with:
Phillip F. Gardiner Canada
Bente Rona Jensen Denmark
Paul H. Strutton United Kingdom
Bernadette Murphy United States
Laurent Grélot France
Maria Pia Francescato Italy
Líliam Fernandes de Oliveira Brazil
Michael Gaetz Canada
Michelle E. Cohen United States
Victoria Galea Canada
Ian Cathers relative to Phillip F. Gardiner Canada Phillip F. Gardiner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Phillip F. Gardiner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Cathers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Cathers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Cathers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Cathers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Cathers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Cathers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Cathers. The network helps show where Ian Cathers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Ian Cathers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Cathers Line = papers co-authored together Ian Cathers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008215
2 2011139
3 2004118
4 1980112
5 201169
6 201067
7 201364
8 201151
9 199543
10 201138
11 200937
12 200534
13 200834
14 199934
15 200733
16 200430
17 201528
18 201227
19 201126
20 201223

About Ian Cathers

Ian Cathers is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Epidemiology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pharmacology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shoulder Injury and Treatment (15 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (12 papers), Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (10 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (7 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (5 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (4 papers) and Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (149 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (74 citations), Pharmacology (245 citations), Neurology (103 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (235 citations). Ian Cathers has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Jordan. Frequent co-authors include Karen Ginn, Craig Boettcher, Mark Halaki, Chin Moi Chow, Nicholas O’Dwyer, Brian L. Day, Richard C. Fitzpatrick, Ayman M. Hamdan‐Mansour, N. A. Walker and F. A. SMITH. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of science and medicine in sport, Experimental Brain Research, Clinical Anatomy, Journal of Biomechanics and Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact