Countries citing papers authored by I. S. Khairwal
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of I. S. Khairwal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. S. Khairwal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. S. Khairwal more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. S. Khairwal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. S. Khairwal. The network helps show where I. S. Khairwal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of I. S. Khairwal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I. S. Khairwal.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I. S. Khairwal based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with I. S. Khairwal. I. S. Khairwal is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Yadav, O. P., Mahalingam Govindaraj, I. S. Khairwal, et al.. (2014). Notification of crop varieties and registration of germplasm: Pearl millet variety ‘Dhanashakti’. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The). 74(3). 405–406.3 indexed citations
2.
Yadav, O. P., et al.. (2014). Dhanashakti : A high-iron pearl millet variety. Indian Farming. 64(7). 32–34.12 indexed citations
3.
Khairwal, I. S., et al.. (2014). Variety Dhanashakti (Pearlmillet).1 indexed citations
4.
Yadav, O. P., et al.. (2013). MPMH 17 –a new medium maturing dual-purpose pearl millet hybrid. Indian Farming. 63(9).
5.
Yadav, R. S., Catherine Howarth, C T Hash, J. R. Witcombe, & I. S. Khairwal. (2013). Successful Marker-Assisted Selectionfor Disease Resistance and drought Tolerance in Pearl Millet in India. 18–26.1 indexed citations
Thakur, R. P., et al.. (2008). Strategy for downy mildew resistance breeding in pearl millet in India. Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics).22 indexed citations
Yadav, O. P. & I. S. Khairwal. (2007). Progress towards developing dual-purpose cultivars of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) in India. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 77(10). 645–648.5 indexed citations
11.
Singh, Priyanka, et al.. (2007). Yield Gap Analysis of Sorghum and Pearl Millet in India Using Simulation Modeling:Global Theme on AgroecosystemsReport no. 37.12 indexed citations
12.
Thakur, R. P., H. Shekar Shetty, & I. S. Khairwal. (2006). Pearl Millet Downy Mildew Research in India: Progress and Perspectives. Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics).20 indexed citations
Khairwal, I. S., et al.. (1997). Physical, physiological and cooking qualities of pearl millet and their correlations. Journal of Food Science and Technology-mysore. 34(2). 165–170.7 indexed citations
Khairwal, I. S., et al.. (1990). Detection of epistasis and estimation of additive and dominance components in pearl millet.. Crop improvement. 17(1). 78–80.2 indexed citations
19.
Khairwal, I. S., et al.. (1990). Pearl Millet: Seed Production and Technology.8 indexed citations
20.
Khairwal, I. S., Sudeep Singh, & Om Parkash. (1986). Smut reactions of pearl millet lines and hybrids with and without cytoplasmic male sterility.. 52(6). 751–754.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.