I. Novikov

1.4k total citations
2 papers, 5 citations indexed

About

I. Novikov is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, I. Novikov has authored 2 papers receiving a total of 5 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1 paper in Oceanography and 1 paper in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in I. Novikov's work include Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (1 paper), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (1 paper) and Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry (1 paper). I. Novikov is often cited by papers focused on Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (1 paper), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (1 paper) and Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry (1 paper). I. Novikov collaborates with scholars based in Denmark and Russia. I. Novikov's co-authors include Н. Д. Кундикова and Pavel Naselsky and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Modern Physics D and Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.

In The Last Decade

I. Novikov

2 papers receiving 5 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
I. Novikov Denmark	2	3	2	2	1	1	2	5
R.-R. Rohloff Spain	2	3 1.0×	2 1.0×	2 1.0×			3	5
A. Abreu Aramburu Canada	2	3 1.0×	1 0.5×	2 1.0×			2	6
F. Bellachia France	1	2 0.7×	2 1.0×				2	3
Ray Boucarut United States	2	2 0.7×	2 1.0×	1 0.5×		1 1.0×	2	4
T. J. N. Nelson United States	3	3 1.0×		2 1.0×			4	7
K. Wamba United States	2	3 1.0×					2	3
J. Munch Australia	2	3 1.0×	1 0.5×				2	6
K. Stakkestad Canada	2	3 1.0×					2	3
M. Kruskal United States	2	2 0.7×	2 1.0×				2	4
Jeffrey Lees United States	2	3 1.0×	1 0.5×	1 0.5×			4	5

Countries citing papers authored by I. Novikov

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. Novikov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Novikov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Novikov more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. Novikov

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Novikov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Novikov. The network helps show where I. Novikov may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of I. Novikov

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I. Novikov. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I. Novikov based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I. Novikov. I. Novikov is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

2 of 2 papers shown

1.

Кундикова, Н. Д., et al.. (2006). A method of measurement of polarized light ellipticity only. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6024. 60240D–60240D. 2 indexed citations

2.

Naselsky, Pavel, et al.. (1997). Structure of the Polarization Field Around High Peaks of the CMB Anisotropy. International Journal of Modern Physics D. 6(5). 515–533. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact