I. M. Turner

6.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
176 papers, 4.9k citations indexed

About

I. M. Turner is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, I. M. Turner has authored 176 papers receiving a total of 4.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 113 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 89 papers in Molecular Biology and 77 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in I. M. Turner's work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (95 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (88 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (31 papers). I. M. Turner is often cited by papers focused on Plant Diversity and Evolution (95 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (88 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (31 papers). I. M. Turner collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Singapore and Australia. I. M. Turner's co-authors include Richard T. Corlett, Hugh Tiang Wah Tan, P. J. Grubb, David F. R. P. Burslem, Peter W. Lucas, Joy Ong, M. F. Choong, Ali Bin Ibrahim, P. T. K. Chew and Daniel J. Metcalfe and has published in prestigious journals such as Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and New Phytologist.

In The Last Decade

I. M. Turner

156 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Hit Papers

Species Loss in Fragments of Tropical Rain Forest: A Revi... 1996 2026 2006 2016 1996 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
I. M. Turner United Kingdom 33 2.5k 2.0k 1.3k 1.2k 1.1k 176 4.9k
Irène Hummel France 18 2.4k 1.0× 1.4k 0.7× 1.2k 0.9× 1.9k 1.6× 1.2k 1.0× 28 5.0k
Stephen H. Bullock Mexico 28 2.0k 0.8× 2.1k 1.0× 970 0.7× 1.3k 1.1× 957 0.8× 103 4.0k
Christopher Baraloto United States 41 3.6k 1.5× 2.2k 1.1× 1.5k 1.1× 1.3k 1.1× 2.1k 1.8× 114 6.1k
Jitka Klimešová Czechia 41 3.8k 1.5× 2.8k 1.4× 1.4k 1.1× 2.8k 2.3× 966 0.9× 181 5.8k
Lindsay A. Turnbull United Kingdom 35 2.9k 1.2× 2.2k 1.1× 1.7k 1.3× 2.3k 1.9× 1.0k 0.9× 62 5.7k
Brenda B. Casper United States 39 3.4k 1.4× 2.5k 1.3× 1.3k 1.0× 3.4k 2.8× 1.4k 1.2× 96 7.0k
Nigel C. A. Pitman United States 29 3.7k 1.5× 2.3k 1.2× 1.4k 1.1× 752 0.6× 1.8k 1.6× 64 5.8k
Max Debussche France 33 3.4k 1.4× 2.3k 1.2× 1.4k 1.1× 1.8k 1.5× 1.1k 1.0× 62 5.2k
J. A. Ratter Brazil 25 2.2k 0.9× 2.1k 1.0× 1.1k 0.8× 927 0.8× 1.0k 0.9× 54 4.5k
Stephen P. Bonser Australia 27 2.3k 0.9× 1.7k 0.9× 1.1k 0.8× 1.7k 1.4× 1.1k 1.0× 94 4.6k

Countries citing papers authored by I. M. Turner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. M. Turner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. M. Turner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. M. Turner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. M. Turner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. M. Turner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. M. Turner. The network helps show where I. M. Turner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of I. M. Turner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I. M. Turner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I. M. Turner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I. M. Turner. I. M. Turner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Utteridge, Timothy M. A. & I. M. Turner. (2024). Flora of Singapore precursors, 47: The genus Phytocrene (Icacinaceae) in Singapore. Gardens’ Bulletin Singapore. 76(2). 229–241.
2.
Maurin, Olivier, Félix Forest, I. M. Turner, et al.. (2023). Drift in the tropics: Phylogenetics and biogeographical patterns in Combretaceae. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 32(10). 1790–1802. 5 indexed citations
4.
Maurin, Olivier, Félix Forest, I. M. Turner, et al.. (2022). Drift in the tropics: Phylogenetics and biogeographical patterns in Combretaceae. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 3 indexed citations
5.
Turner, I. M.. (2021). Notes on Some Names of South Asian Plants with a Connection to William Roxburgh. Annales Botanici Fennici. 58(4-6). 1 indexed citations
6.
Maurin, Olivier, I. M. Turner, J.S. Boatwright, & Maarten J. M. Christenhusz. (2020). New Combinations in Combretaceae subtribe Combretinae from Africa and Asia. Phytotaxa. 451(3). 2 indexed citations
8.
Chen, Junhao, et al.. (2018). "Artabotrys scortechinii (Annonaceae): an augmented species description and a new record for Singapore". Gardens’ Bulletin Singapore. 70(1). 3–8. 3 indexed citations
9.
Turner, I. M.. (2014). A consideration of Cleistopetalum and a new combination in Polyalthia (Annonaceae). Phytotaxa. 8(1). 41–45. 1 indexed citations
10.
Turner, I. M.. (2011). The transfer of Desmos caudatus C. E. C. Fisch. (Annonaceae) to Meiogyne. Kew Bulletin. 66(4). 587–588. 2 indexed citations
11.
Turner, I. M.. (2009). New species and nomenclatural combinations in Polyalthia, Meiogyne and Mitrella (Annonaceae) from Borneo.. 61(4). 267–276. 5 indexed citations
12.
Turner, I. M. & David M. Johnson. (2009). Two New Species ofXylopia(Annonaceae) from Borneo. Harvard Papers in Botany. 14(2). 129–135. 3 indexed citations
13.
Grubb, P. J., Ignacio M. Barberis, Jennie N. Bee, et al.. (2008). Monocot Leaves are Eaten Less than Dicot Leaves in Tropical Lowland Rain Forests: Correlations with Toughness and Leaf Presentation. Annals of Botany. 101(9). 1379–1389. 42 indexed citations
14.
Dominy, Nathaniel J., P. J. Grubb, Peter W. Lucas, et al.. (2008). In Tropical Lowland Rain Forests Monocots have Tougher Leaves than Dicots, and Include a New Kind of Tough Leaf. Annals of Botany. 101(9). 1363–1377. 37 indexed citations
15.
Lughadha, Eimear Nic, Wilhelm Barthlott, Neil Brummitt, et al.. (2005). Measuring the fate of plant diversity: towards a foundation for future monitoring and opportunities for urgent action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 360(1454). 359–372. 69 indexed citations
16.
Turner, I. M., et al.. (1998). The use of Epipremnum pinnatum (Araceae) in Singapore in the treatment of cancer : an unreported application of a herbal medicine. Economic Botany. 52(1). 108–109. 5 indexed citations
17.
Turner, I. M., et al.. (1998). The botany of the islands of Mersing District, Johore. Peninsular Malaysia. 2. The floras of Pulau Aur and Pulau Pemanggil, with notes on the smaller islands. Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution). 1 indexed citations
18.
Turner, I. M. & Richard T. Corlett. (1996). The conservation value of small, isolated fragments of lowland tropical rain forest. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 11(8). 330–333. 476 indexed citations
19.
Turner, I. M.. (1993). How Tough are Sclerophylls?. Annals of Botany. 71(4). 343–345. 28 indexed citations
20.
Turner, I. M.. (1989). A shading experiment on some tropical rain forest tree seedlings.. JOURNAL OF TROPICAL FOREST SCIENCE. 1(4). 383–389. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026