I. H. Urch
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Atmospheric Science
- Co-authors
- L. J. GleesonJ. Smak
- Topics
- Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (14 papers)Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (7 papers)Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
I. H. Urch
18 papers receiving 282 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 320
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 104
- Artificial Intelligence 68
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 49
- Atmospheric Science 39
Countries citing papers authored by I. H. Urch
This map shows the geographic impact of I. H. Urch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. H. Urch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. H. Urch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by I. H. Urch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. H. Urch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. H. Urch. The network helps show where I. H. Urch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of I. H. Urch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I. H. Urch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I. H. Urch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I. H. Urch. I. H. Urch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Changing trends in variable star research | 39 |
| 4 | International Astronomical Union Colloquium No. 46, Changing trends in variable star research, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand, November 27 - December 1, 1978 | 15 |
| 5 | 33 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 51 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | Azimuthal structure in the solar wind. | 5 |
| 11 | 67 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 55 | |
| 16 | Theoretical studies of the interplanetary medium | 3 |
| 17 | RADIAL GRADIENTS AND ANISOTROPIES OF GALACTIC COSMIC-RAYS. | 1 |
| 18 | Energy Changes of Solar Cosmic-Ray Particles. | 2 |
| 19 | 12 |
About I. H. Urch
I. H. Urch is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Instrumentation, having authored 19 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (14 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (7 papers) and Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (320 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (104 citations) and Instrumentation (12 citations). I. H. Urch has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include L. J. Gleeson and J. Smak. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Solar Physics and Astrophysics and Space Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.