I. E. Spektor

95 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

I. E. Spektor
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 540
  • Biophysics 82
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 816
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 351
  • Molecular Biology 779
Replace Manabu Sato with:
Manabu Sato Japan
Moritz Kreysing Germany
Tunan Chen China
Keith Bonin United States
Gareth J. Evans United Kingdom
Pál Ormos Hungary
Suhyun Kim South Korea
Luigi Bonacina Switzerland
Karen C. Cheung Canada
Yoshiyuki Konishi Japan
I. E. Spektor relative to Manabu Sato Japan Manabu Sato's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Manabu Sato · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I. E. Spektor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. E. Spektor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. E. Spektor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. E. Spektor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. E. Spektor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. E. Spektor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. E. Spektor. The network helps show where I. E. Spektor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I. E. Spektor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I. E. Spektor Line = papers co-authored together I. E. Spektor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1976252
2 1978145
3 1981124
4 2005123
5 197994
6
Latrunculin-A increases outflow facility in the monkey.
199982
7 201770
8 202169
9 201368
10 201765
11 201961
12 197956
13 201852
14 197748
15 198648
16 199646
17 201045
18 201942
19 201941
20 200835

About I. E. Spektor

I. E. Spektor is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomedical Engineering and Biophysics, having authored 97 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Terahertz technology and applications (43 papers), Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials (14 papers), Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies (12 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (11 papers), Superconducting and THz Device Technology (10 papers), Optical and Acousto-Optic Technologies (9 papers), Photonic Crystals and Applications (8 papers) and Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (540 citations), Biophysics (82 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (816 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (351 citations) and Molecular Biology (779 citations). I. E. Spektor has collaborated with scholars based in Russia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Wouter H. Moolenaar, G. A. Komandin, Mark C. Fishman, Yosef Kimhi, Uriel Z. Littauer, Yoram Barak, O. E. Porodinkov, Kirill I. Zaytsev, Nikita V. Chernomyrdin and Maksim Skorobogatiy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, The Journal of Physiology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and Journal of Physics D Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026