I. Bivas

1.7k citations
47 papers · 1.2k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

I. Bivas

47 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

I. Bivas
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 510
  • Molecular Biology 1.0k
  • Organic Chemistry 231
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 66
  • Biomaterials 94
Replace Maria Maddalena Sperotto with:
Maria Maddalena Sperotto Denmark
Thierry Charitat France
Ling Miao Canada
Timothy V. Ratto United States
Tanja Pott France
Jaakko J. Uusitalo Netherlands
Mihaela Mihailescu United States
Karin Berndl Germany
Jeffrey D. Carbeck United States
Natalya Bezlyepkina Germany
I. Bivas relative to Maria Maddalena Sperotto Denmark Maria Maddalena Sperotto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Maria Maddalena Sperotto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I. Bivas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. Bivas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Bivas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Bivas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. Bivas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Bivas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Bivas. The network helps show where I. Bivas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I. Bivas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I. Bivas Line = papers co-authored together I. Bivas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997262
2 1989209
3 1994109
4 1984102
5 198775
6 200551
7 201341
8 200639
9 200332
10 200426
11 198123
12 201519
13 201818
14 201017
15 200616
16 200315
17 201014
18 19999
19 19859
20 19928

About I. Bivas

I. Bivas is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Organic Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (37 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (21 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (13 papers), Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies (5 papers), Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (4 papers), Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (4 papers) and Advanced Materials and Mechanics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (510 citations), Molecular Biology (1.0k citations), Organic Chemistry (231 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (66 citations) and Biomaterials (94 citations). I. Bivas has collaborated with scholars based in Bulgaria, France and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Philippe Méléard, Michel Mitov, P. Bothorel, А. Г. Петров, Victoria Vitkova, Tanja Pott, J.F. Faucon, Julia Genova, Jean Dufourcq and Olivier Aguerre-Chariol. Their work appears in journals such as Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, Liquid Crystals, European Biophysics Journal, Cryogenics and Europhysics Letters (EPL).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact