Hunter E. Halverson

598 total citations
19 papers, 448 citations indexed

About

Hunter E. Halverson is a scholar working on Neurology, Ophthalmology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Hunter E. Halverson has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 448 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Neurology, 10 papers in Ophthalmology and 9 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Hunter E. Halverson's work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (13 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (10 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers). Hunter E. Halverson is often cited by papers focused on Vestibular and auditory disorders (13 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (10 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers). Hunter E. Halverson collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Australia. Hunter E. Halverson's co-authors include John H. Freeman, Michael D. Mauk, Amy Poremba, Asgar Zaheer, John A. Wemmie, Ramón Lim, Baoli Yang, George J Augustine, Bradley C. Love and Yujin Kim and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Brain Research and eLife.

In The Last Decade

Hunter E. Halverson

19 papers receiving 441 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hunter E. Halverson United States 13 273 230 228 130 77 19 448
Pablo M. Blázquez United States 11 281 1.0× 132 0.6× 213 0.9× 88 0.7× 116 1.5× 18 423
Kristina B. Irwin United States 9 233 0.9× 120 0.5× 115 0.5× 99 0.8× 49 0.6× 10 337
Milton Pong United States 11 198 0.7× 118 0.5× 186 0.8× 42 0.3× 65 0.8× 13 366
Robert A. Hensbroek Netherlands 9 264 1.0× 268 1.2× 192 0.8× 49 0.4× 128 1.7× 11 527
Boeke J. van Beugen Netherlands 8 445 1.6× 341 1.5× 278 1.2× 73 0.6× 206 2.7× 8 683
Eisuke Akase United States 6 139 0.5× 257 1.1× 306 1.3× 60 0.5× 30 0.4× 6 412
Jochen K. Spanke Netherlands 5 198 0.7× 182 0.8× 198 0.9× 28 0.2× 85 1.1× 5 373
Misao Kano Japan 7 324 1.2× 203 0.9× 210 0.9× 42 0.3× 77 1.0× 14 466
I. Reichenberger Germany 8 199 0.7× 146 0.6× 71 0.3× 47 0.4× 92 1.2× 11 349
J.M. Delgado-García Spain 11 134 0.5× 168 0.7× 105 0.5× 45 0.3× 42 0.5× 15 361

Countries citing papers authored by Hunter E. Halverson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hunter E. Halverson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hunter E. Halverson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hunter E. Halverson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hunter E. Halverson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hunter E. Halverson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hunter E. Halverson. The network helps show where Hunter E. Halverson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hunter E. Halverson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hunter E. Halverson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hunter E. Halverson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hunter E. Halverson. Hunter E. Halverson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Love, Bradley C., et al.. (2024). Disrupting dorsal hippocampus impairs category learning in rats. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 212. 107941–107941. 1 indexed citations
2.
Halverson, Hunter E., et al.. (2023). Dynamic Changes in Local Activity and Network Interactions among the Anterior Cingulate, Amygdala, and Cerebellum during Associative Learning. Journal of Neuroscience. 43(49). 8385–8402. 5 indexed citations
3.
Halverson, Hunter E., et al.. (2022). Feedback inhibition underlies new computational functions of cerebellar interneurons. eLife. 11. 5 indexed citations
4.
Halverson, Hunter E., et al.. (2018). Cerebellar Processing Common to Delay and Trace Eyelid Conditioning. Journal of Neuroscience. 38(33). 7221–7236. 11 indexed citations
5.
Halverson, Hunter E., et al.. (2016). Systematic variation of acquisition rate in delay eyelid conditioning.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 130(6). 553–562. 2 indexed citations
6.
Halverson, Hunter E., Amy Poremba, & John H. Freeman. (2015). Medial auditory thalamus is necessary for acquisition and retention of eyeblink conditioning to cochlear nucleus stimulation. Learning & Memory. 22(5). 258–266. 5 indexed citations
7.
Halverson, Hunter E., et al.. (2015). Relating Cerebellar Purkinje Cell Activity to the Timing and Amplitude of Conditioned Eyelid Responses. Journal of Neuroscience. 35(20). 7813–7832. 60 indexed citations
8.
Halverson, Hunter E., et al.. (2015). Links Between Single-Trial Changes and Learning Rate in Eyelid Conditioning. The Cerebellum. 15(2). 112–121. 12 indexed citations
9.
Mauk, Michael D., et al.. (2014). Cerebellar Mechanisms of Learning and Plasticity Revealed by Delay Eyelid Conditioning. International review of neurobiology. 117. 21–37. 22 indexed citations
10.
Halverson, Hunter E., et al.. (2010). Associative Plasticity in the Medial Auditory Thalamus and Cerebellar Interpositus Nucleus during Eyeblink Conditioning. Journal of Neuroscience. 30(26). 8787–8796. 36 indexed citations
11.
Halverson, Hunter E. & John H. Freeman. (2010). Ventral lateral geniculate input to the medial pons is necessary for visual eyeblink conditioning in rats. Learning & Memory. 17(2). 80–85. 26 indexed citations
12.
Halverson, Hunter E., et al.. (2009). Stimulation of the lateral geniculate, superior colliculus, or visual cortex is sufficient for eyeblink conditioning in rats. Learning & Memory. 16(5). 300–307. 16 indexed citations
13.
Halverson, Hunter E. & John H. Freeman. (2009). Medial auditory thalamic input to the lateral pontine nuclei is necessary for auditory eyeblink conditioning. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 93(1). 92–98. 35 indexed citations
14.
Halverson, Hunter E., Amy Poremba, & John H. Freeman. (2008). Medial auditory thalamus inactivation prevents acquisition and retention of eyeblink conditioning. Learning & Memory. 15(7). 532–538. 27 indexed citations
15.
Freeman, John H., et al.. (2007). Inferior colliculus lesions impair eyeblink conditioning in rats. Learning & Memory. 14(12). 842–846. 26 indexed citations
16.
Halverson, Hunter E., et al.. (2007). Medial auditory thalamic stimulation as a conditioned stimulus for eyeblink conditioning in rats. Learning & Memory. 14(3). 152–159. 36 indexed citations
17.
Halverson, Hunter E. & John H. Freeman. (2006). Medial auditory thalamic nuclei are necessary for eyeblink conditioning.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 120(4). 880–887. 41 indexed citations
18.
Freeman, John H., Hunter E. Halverson, & Amy Poremba. (2005). Differential Effects of Cerebellar Inactivation on Eyeblink Conditioned Excitation and Inhibition. Journal of Neuroscience. 25(4). 889–895. 47 indexed citations
19.
Lim, Ramón, Asgar Zaheer, John H. Freeman, et al.. (2004). Impaired motor performance and learning in glia maturation factor-knockout mice. Brain Research. 1024(1-2). 225–232. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026