Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Joint Radar and Communication Design: Applications, State-of-the-Art, and the Road Ahead
Countries citing papers authored by Hugh Griffiths
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh Griffiths's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh Griffiths with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh Griffiths more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh Griffiths. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh Griffiths. The network helps show where Hugh Griffiths may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hugh Griffiths
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hugh Griffiths.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hugh Griffiths based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Hugh Griffiths. Hugh Griffiths is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Griffiths, Hugh, et al.. (2016). Tracking Parameter Control in Multifunction Radar Network Incorporating Information Sharing. UCL Discovery (University College London).6 indexed citations
2.
Griffiths, Hugh. (2016). Early history of bistatic radar. European Radar Conference.5 indexed citations
Lombardi, Federico, Hugh Griffiths, & Alessio Balleri. (2016). Influence of internal structure on landmine radar signatures. Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha).4 indexed citations
Olsen, Karl Erik, et al.. (2013). K-band radar signature analysis of a flying mallard duck. International Radar Symposium. 2. 584–591.8 indexed citations
Charlish, Alexander, K. Woodbridge, & Hugh Griffiths. (2012). Multi-target tracking control using Continuous Double Auction Parameter Selection. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 1269–1276.23 indexed citations
10.
Sammartino, P.F., Chris Baker, & Hugh Griffiths. (2010). Range-angle dependent waveform. ANU Open Research (Australian National University). 511–515.32 indexed citations
11.
Balleri, Alessio, Hugh Griffiths, K. Woodbridge, Chris Baker, & Marc W. Holderied. (2009). Bat-pollinated plants: Feature extraction for target recognition in the natural world. UCL Discovery (University College London).7 indexed citations
12.
Cherniakov, Mikhail, Marco D’Errico, Alberto Moreira, et al.. (2008). Bistatic radar : emerging technology. John Wiley & Sons eBooks.95 indexed citations
Griffiths, Hugh, et al.. (1992). False alarm control in spiky clutter by multi-burst range-Doppler processing. 94–97.1 indexed citations
20.
Griffiths, Hugh & Ningbo Long. (1986). Television-based bistatic radar. IEE Proceedings F Communications, Radar and Signal Processing. 133(7). 649–657.194 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.