Hugh Deeming

454 total citations
17 papers, 296 citations indexed

About

Hugh Deeming is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Global and Planetary Change and Civil and Structural Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Hugh Deeming has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 296 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 7 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 3 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering. Recurrent topics in Hugh Deeming's work include Disaster Management and Resilience (9 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (7 papers) and Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis (3 papers). Hugh Deeming is often cited by papers focused on Disaster Management and Resilience (9 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (7 papers) and Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis (3 papers). Hugh Deeming collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Italy. Hugh Deeming's co-authors include Nigel Watson, Elham Kashefi, Rebecca Whittle, Gordon Walker, Maggie Mort, Clare Twigger-Ross, Will Medd, Sylvia Kruse, Mark Pelling and Maureen Fordham and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms and Natural hazards and earth system sciences.

In The Last Decade

Hugh Deeming

16 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hugh Deeming United Kingdom 9 197 157 49 42 27 17 296
Pauline Texier France 6 315 1.6× 125 0.8× 69 1.4× 37 0.9× 16 0.6× 13 505
Jenna Tyler United States 11 213 1.1× 183 1.2× 36 0.7× 53 1.3× 23 0.9× 26 338
Abul Kalam Azad Bangladesh 9 194 1.0× 137 0.9× 49 1.0× 39 0.9× 31 1.1× 27 347
Gulsan Ara Parvin Japan 12 324 1.6× 241 1.5× 49 1.0× 76 1.8× 25 0.9× 27 574
Andrew Rumbach United States 12 261 1.3× 192 1.2× 32 0.7× 32 0.8× 32 1.2× 22 433
Henry Ngenyam Bang United Kingdom 12 227 1.2× 159 1.0× 59 1.2× 27 0.6× 21 0.8× 28 378
Ailsa Holloway South Africa 8 159 0.8× 96 0.6× 32 0.7× 26 0.6× 10 0.4× 13 290
Sarah J. Halvorson United States 11 175 0.9× 61 0.4× 43 0.9× 22 0.5× 15 0.6× 32 382
Patrick Pigeon France 11 298 1.5× 166 1.1× 37 0.8× 35 0.8× 14 0.5× 34 448
Meri Davlasheridze United States 13 227 1.2× 215 1.4× 15 0.3× 71 1.7× 43 1.6× 33 429

Countries citing papers authored by Hugh Deeming

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh Deeming's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh Deeming with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh Deeming more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh Deeming

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh Deeming. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh Deeming. The network helps show where Hugh Deeming may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hugh Deeming

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hugh Deeming. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hugh Deeming based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hugh Deeming. Hugh Deeming is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Deeming, Hugh & John Lamb. (2023). Integrated emergency management of ‘lifeline’ highway networks: lessons for interoperability. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Civil Engineering. 177(5). 3–10.
2.
Kruse, Sylvia, Hugh Deeming, Maureen Fordham, et al.. (2017). Conceptualizing community resilience to natural hazards – the emBRACE framework. Natural hazards and earth system sciences. 17(12). 2321–2333. 53 indexed citations
3.
Matin, Nilufar, Richard Taylor, John Forrester, et al.. (2015). Report : Mapping of social networks as a measure of social resilience of agents. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 1 indexed citations
4.
Twigger-Ross, Clare, Hugh Deeming, Jane Fielding, et al.. (2015). Flood Resilience Community Pathfinder evaluation: final evaluation report. Research Repository (Kingston University London). 12 indexed citations
5.
Medd, Will, Hugh Deeming, Gordon Walker, et al.. (2014). The flood recovery gap: a real‐time study of local recovery following the floods of June 2007 in Hull, North East England. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 8(4). 315–328. 34 indexed citations
6.
Deeming, Hugh, et al.. (2014). embrace (WP5) Case Study Report: Floods in Northern England. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University). 2 indexed citations
7.
Twigger-Ross, Clare, Elham Kashefi, Sue Weldon, et al.. (2014). Flood Resilience Community Pathfinder Evaluation: Rapid Evidence Assessment. Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London). 28 indexed citations
8.
Deeming, Hugh. (2013). Clarifying Resilience: an invited comment. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University). 1 indexed citations
9.
Twigger-Ross, Clare, et al.. (2012). Community Resilience Research: UK Case Studies, Lessons and Recommendations report to the Cabinet Office and Defence Science and Technology Laboratory.. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University). 5 indexed citations
10.
Deeming, Hugh, et al.. (2011). Recommendations for changes in UK National Recovery Guidance (NRG) and associated guidance, from the perspective of Lancaster University’s Hull Flood Studies. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University). 4 indexed citations
11.
Twigger-Ross, Clare, et al.. (2011). Community resilience research: Final report on theoretical research and analysis of case studies, report to the Cabinet Office and Defence Science and Technology Laboratory. Research Repository (Kingston University London). 10 indexed citations
12.
Deeming, Hugh, et al.. (2010). UK Civil Protection Guidance Inventory Phase 1: Final Report.. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 119(12). 2004–2013. 1 indexed citations
13.
Whittle, Rebecca, Hugh Deeming, Elham Kashefi, et al.. (2010). After the rain - learning the lessons from flood recovery in Hull. Final project report for 'Flood, Vulnerability and Urban Resilience: a real-time study of local recovery following the floods of June 2007 in Hull'.. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 45 indexed citations
14.
Whittle, Rebecca, Will Medd, Hugh Deeming, et al.. (2010). After the Rain – learning the lessons from flood recovery in Hull. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University). 23 indexed citations
15.
Watson, Nigel, et al.. (2009). Beyond Bureaucracy? Assessing Institutional Change in the Governance of Water in England. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 47 indexed citations
16.
Carrivick, Jonathan L., et al.. (2009). Geomorphological evidence towards a de‐glacial control on volcanism. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 34(8). 1164–1178. 27 indexed citations
17.
Watson, Nigel, et al.. (2009). Beyond bureaucracy? Assessing Institutional Change in the Governance of Water in England and Wales. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026