Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Statistical Treatment of Experimental Data
1964399 citationsHugh D. Young et al.American Journal of Physicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh D. Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh D. Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh D. Young more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh D. Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh D. Young. The network helps show where Hugh D. Young may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hugh D. Young
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hugh D. Young.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hugh D. Young based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Hugh D. Young. Hugh D. Young is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Young, Hugh D., et al.. (2013). Sears and Zemansky's university physics : with modern physics : technology update.8 indexed citations
2.
Young, Hugh D. & Roger A. Freedman. (2013). University Physics with Modern Physics Technology Update.4 indexed citations
3.
Anderson, Wayne, et al.. (2012). Student solutions manual : Sears & Zemansky's university physics, 13th edition.3 indexed citations
4.
Young, Hugh D., et al.. (2008). Student solutions manual : Sears & Zemansky's University physics, 12th edition, Young and Freedman.1 indexed citations
5.
Young, Hugh D., et al.. (2006). Sears & Zemansky's College Physics. Medical Entomology and Zoology.5 indexed citations
6.
Young, Hugh D., et al.. (2003). Sears and Zemansky's University Physics With Modern Physics. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).73 indexed citations
7.
Freedman, Roger A. & Hugh D. Young. (2003). University Physics with Modern Physics. Medical Entomology and Zoology.112 indexed citations
8.
Young, Hugh D. & Roger A. Freedman. (1999). Sears and Zemansky's University Physics. Medical Entomology and Zoology.80 indexed citations
9.
Young, Hugh D., et al.. (1982). The Macdonald encyclopedia of trees.1 indexed citations
10.
Sears, Francis W., Mark W. Zemansky, & Hugh D. Young. (1982). University Physics Part 1.2 indexed citations
11.
Young, Hugh D.. (1978). Fundamentals of Waves, Optics and Modern Physics. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
12.
Young, Hugh D.. (1968). Fundamentals of Optics and Modern Physics. Medical Entomology and Zoology.3 indexed citations
13.
Young, Hugh D., et al.. (1964). Statistical Treatment of Experimental Data. American Journal of Physics. 32(4). 322–322.399 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.