H.‐U. Worm

503 total citations
12 papers, 417 citations indexed

About

H.‐U. Worm is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Geophysics and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, H.‐U. Worm has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 417 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Molecular Biology, 6 papers in Geophysics and 5 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. Recurrent topics in H.‐U. Worm's work include Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (10 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (5 papers) and Magnetic Properties and Applications (5 papers). H.‐U. Worm is often cited by papers focused on Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (10 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (5 papers) and Magnetic Properties and Applications (5 papers). H.‐U. Worm collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Australia. H.‐U. Worm's co-authors include Mike Jackson, Santanu Banerjee, David Clark, Mark J. Dekkers, Udo Barckhausen, Martín Meschede, Paul Kelso, Patrick J. Ryan and Ulrich Hambach and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Journal of Applied Physics and Earth and Planetary Science Letters.

In The Last Decade

H.‐U. Worm

12 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
H.‐U. Worm Germany 11 298 296 120 69 46 12 417
Song Xu Canada 12 260 0.9× 415 1.4× 179 1.5× 136 2.0× 50 1.1× 16 460
Alan Stephenson United Kingdom 9 506 1.7× 574 1.9× 304 2.5× 44 0.6× 36 0.8× 11 670
H. Porath United States 17 683 2.3× 387 1.3× 63 0.5× 21 0.3× 23 0.5× 25 805
Brian Carter‐Stiglitz United States 11 214 0.7× 381 1.3× 268 2.2× 41 0.6× 25 0.5× 13 472
Lesleis Nagy United Kingdom 14 246 0.8× 388 1.3× 166 1.4× 51 0.7× 94 2.0× 27 524
E. J. Schwarz Canada 17 535 1.8× 543 1.8× 317 2.6× 23 0.3× 40 0.9× 41 711
Andrei Kosterov Russia 14 357 1.2× 481 1.6× 307 2.6× 24 0.3× 68 1.5× 43 608
Zhongshan Shen China 12 197 0.7× 79 0.3× 66 0.6× 99 1.4× 62 1.3× 26 515
E. R. Deutsch Canada 18 501 1.7× 543 1.8× 310 2.6× 53 0.8× 28 0.6× 47 680
David Krása Germany 14 565 1.9× 625 2.1× 450 3.8× 17 0.2× 28 0.6× 21 705

Countries citing papers authored by H.‐U. Worm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H.‐U. Worm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H.‐U. Worm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H.‐U. Worm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H.‐U. Worm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H.‐U. Worm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H.‐U. Worm. The network helps show where H.‐U. Worm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H.‐U. Worm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H.‐U. Worm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H.‐U. Worm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H.‐U. Worm. H.‐U. Worm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
2.
Meschede, Martín, Udo Barckhausen, & H.‐U. Worm. (1998). Extinct spreading on the Cocos Ridge. Terra Nova. 10(4). 211–216. 56 indexed citations
3.
4.
Worm, H.‐U., David Clark, & Mark J. Dekkers. (1993). Magnetic Susceptibility of Pyrrhotite: Grain Size, Field and Frequency Dependence. Geophysical Journal International. 114(1). 127–137. 79 indexed citations
5.
Worm, H.‐U., et al.. (1991). Magnetic viscosity of single domain magnetite particles. Journal of Applied Physics. 70(10). 5533–5537. 10 indexed citations
6.
Worm, H.‐U., Patrick J. Ryan, & Santanu Banerjee. (1991). Domain size, closure domains, and the importance of magnetostriction in magnetite. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 102(1). 71–78. 28 indexed citations
7.
Worm, H.‐U. & Santanu Banerjee. (1990). Evidence for TRM domain wall moments?. Geophysical Journal International. 102(2). 359–364. 2 indexed citations
8.
Worm, H.‐U.. (1989). Comment on “Can remanent magnetization in the deep crust contribute to long wavelength magnetic anomalies?” by Peter N. Shive. Geophysical Research Letters. 16(6). 595–597. 10 indexed citations
9.
Worm, H.‐U., Mike Jackson, Paul Kelso, & Santanu Banerjee. (1988). Thermal demagnetization of partial thermoremanent magnetization. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 93(B10). 12196–12204. 64 indexed citations
10.
Worm, H.‐U. & Mike Jackson. (1988). Theoretical time‐temperature relationships of magnetization for distributions of single domain magnetite grains. Geophysical Research Letters. 15(10). 1093–1096. 19 indexed citations
11.
Worm, H.‐U., et al.. (1987). Magnetic hysteresis properties of fine particle titanomagnetites precipitated in a silicate matrix. Physics of The Earth and Planetary Interiors. 46(1-3). 84–92. 52 indexed citations
12.
Worm, H.‐U., et al.. (1987). The preparation of dispersed titanomagnetite particles by the glass-ceramic method. Physics of The Earth and Planetary Interiors. 46(1-3). 263–269. 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026