Holger Vach

1.6k citations
83 papers · 1.4k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Holger Vach

82 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Holger Vach
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 756
  • Materials Chemistry 624
  • Atmospheric Science 187
  • Computational Mechanics 144
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 83
Replace M. Châtelet with:
M. Châtelet France
R Scott United Kingdom
C. W. Larson United States
K. Bier Germany
M. Douay France
F. Perrot France
Jean‐Bernard Maillet France
D. M. Deaven United States
J. A. Schouten Netherlands
John L. Lyman United States
Holger Vach relative to M. Châtelet France M. Châtelet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
M. Châtelet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Holger Vach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Holger Vach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Holger Vach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Holger Vach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Holger Vach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Holger Vach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Holger Vach. The network helps show where Holger Vach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Holger Vach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Holger Vach Line = papers co-authored together Holger Vach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984105
2 201685
3 199458
4 199250
5 201546
6 201645
7 199538
8 200638
9 199334
10 199934
11 199533
12 198929
13 198728
14 201725
15 201125
16 200325
17 200425
18 201624
19 200523
20 199423

About Holger Vach

Holger Vach is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Atmospheric Science, having authored 83 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (30 papers), Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence (19 papers), Graphene research and applications (17 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (11 papers), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (10 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (10 papers), Nanowire Synthesis and Applications (8 papers) and Thin-Film Transistor Technologies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (756 citations), Materials Chemistry (624 citations), Atmospheric Science (187 citations), Computational Mechanics (144 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (83 citations). Holger Vach has collaborated with scholars based in France, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include M. Châtelet, F. Pradère, A. De Martino, Nihed Chaâbane, I. C. Khoo, G. I. Stegeman, Fatme Jardali, M. De Crescenzi, Isabelle Berbézier and Pere Roca i Cabarrocas. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Chemical Physics Letters, The European Physical Journal D, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact