Ho Bum Kang
About
In The Last Decade
Ho Bum Kang
8 papers receiving 304 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Molecular Biology 204
- Immunology 64
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 45
- Surgery 44
- Oncology 43
Countries citing papers authored by Ho Bum Kang
This map shows the geographic impact of Ho Bum Kang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ho Bum Kang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ho Bum Kang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ho Bum Kang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ho Bum Kang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ho Bum Kang. The network helps show where Ho Bum Kang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ho Bum Kang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ho Bum Kang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ho Bum Kang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ho Bum Kang. Ho Bum Kang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 41 | |
| 3 | 51 | |
| 4 | 62 | |
| 5 | 74 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 25 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.